Madras Highcourt breaking news video www sekarreporter. Com

by Sekar Reporter · Published July 16, 2020 · Updated July 16, 2020

https://youtu.be/amszuvwDIqQ

You may also like...

• 

  . CORAM THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.377 of 2015 1.L.Nagarajan In the result, the A.S.No.337 of 2015 is partly allowed (i) The judgment and decree of the II Additional City Civil Court, Chennai, in O.S.No.8415 of 2010 is modified as follows: (a) The suit is partly decreed directing the first defendant to pay to the plaintiff a sum of Rs.16,60,868/- with future interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the plaint till the date of realization;

  February 8, 2023

   by Sekar Reporter · Published February 8, 2023

• 

  Kumarasamy Mhc Advt: I was there. At any point of time Sathisparasaran pleaded for stay. He argued Section 143 IPC has not been made out. Judge said to Government Advocate that legal question has been raised, file your counter. [11/26, 16:20] Sekarreporter 1:

  November 26, 2022

   by Sekar Reporter · Published November 26, 2022

• 

  Justice M.Duraiswamy and T.V.Tamilselvi held that even if the assessee is engaged in the category of activity of “object of general public utility”, they are entitled for registration under Section 12A. Therefore, the court held that the assessee can claim registration under Section 12A by categorising the activity of the assessee as “object of general public utility”. “In these circumstances, we do not find any error or irregularity in the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. We find no ground much less any substantial question of law to interfere with the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,” the court while dismissing the appeal said.

  February 10, 2021

   by Sekar Reporter · Published February 10, 2021