Madras high court Republic day function now live
Follow:
- Next story The Tamil Nadu Veterinary Graduates Federation (TNVGF) has urged Chief Minister MK Stalin to implement the Madras High Court’s verdict on the recruitment
- Previous story Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice G. Arul Murugan declined to entertain the appeal at the admission stage itself. The court wondered why the department was so keen not to give back the elephants to the Mutt even after six years. To that, the Additional Advocate General (AAG) replied that the health condition of the elephants was not conducive and relied upon the report of a medical examination conducted after the single judge’s orde
Recent Posts
- Justice M Nirmal Kumar, the prosecution sought time to file its response. Accepting the request, the court granted the prosecution time to file a status report. The court also asked the prosecution
- THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ W.P.Crl.No.1246 of 2026 V.Palaniappan ..Petitioner Vs The Commissioner of Police, Chennai Corporation, 132, EVK Sampath Salai, Periamet, Vepery, Parktown, Chennai 600 007. ..Respondent
- MADRAS HIGH COURT DIRECTS POLICE ENQUIRY INTO COMPLAINTS RELATING TO CHETTINAD VIDYASHRAM AND ASSOCIATED TRUSTS.
- HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN Crl. A(MD)Nos.973, 1094 of 2023 and 642 of 2024 Crl.A.(MD) No.973 of 2023 Muthukumar : Appellant(s)/ A3 Vs. The Inspector of Police, Thaadikombu Police Station, Dindigul District. Crime No. 264 of
- [01/06, 17:01] sekarreporter1: Justice M. Dhandapani of #MadrasHighCourt on Monday closed a 2016 writ petition filed by DMK regarding conduct of local body polls in Tamil Nadu. Justice N. Kirubakaran (since retired) had passed elaborate orders in that case and said: “Invariably, many persons who contest the local body elections are chosen by the political parties based on their affluence and muscle power and they are also found to be persons with criminal antecedents.” @THChennai [01/06, 17:01] sekarreporter1: ..
More
Recent Posts
- Justice M Nirmal Kumar, the prosecution sought time to file its response. Accepting the request, the court granted the prosecution time to file a status report. The court also asked the prosecution
- THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ W.P.Crl.No.1246 of 2026 V.Palaniappan ..Petitioner Vs The Commissioner of Police, Chennai Corporation, 132, EVK Sampath Salai, Periamet, Vepery, Parktown, Chennai 600 007. ..Respondent
- MADRAS HIGH COURT DIRECTS POLICE ENQUIRY INTO COMPLAINTS RELATING TO CHETTINAD VIDYASHRAM AND ASSOCIATED TRUSTS.
- HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN Crl. A(MD)Nos.973, 1094 of 2023 and 642 of 2024 Crl.A.(MD) No.973 of 2023 Muthukumar : Appellant(s)/ A3 Vs. The Inspector of Police, Thaadikombu Police Station, Dindigul District. Crime No. 264 of
- [01/06, 17:01] sekarreporter1: Justice M. Dhandapani of #MadrasHighCourt on Monday closed a 2016 writ petition filed by DMK regarding conduct of local body polls in Tamil Nadu. Justice N. Kirubakaran (since retired) had passed elaborate orders in that case and said: “Invariably, many persons who contest the local body elections are chosen by the political parties based on their affluence and muscle power and they are also found to be persons with criminal antecedents.” @THChennai [01/06, 17:01] sekarreporter1: ..