You may also like...
-
Justice M. Nirmal Kumar ordered that the Mahila Court should complete the process of recording the statement, as required under Section 25 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act of 2012 before Thursday because only after that the police would be able to ascertain the veracity of the allegations.
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 24, 2020
-
Relying on the legal principle considered as above, this Court could arrive at the irresistible conclusion that those Government Orders and the judgments of the Single Judges and the Division Bench, running counter to the ratio laid down by the Full Bench judgments cited supra, cannot be a ground to claim the relief of counting of 50% of service in
by Sekar Reporter · Published July 4, 2026
-
Justices G.R. Swaminathan and V. Lakshminarayanan of #MadrasHighCourt commence hearing the case related to Director of Vigilance and Anti Corruption V. Arun after a second pass over. Government Counsel (criminal side) R. John Sathyan is arguing on behalf of the IPS officer. Judges say the detainee may not be a paragon of virtue but the point is whether the detention order passed by the IPS officer is right or not.
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 27, 2026