Madras high court 18th august list
Madras high court 18th august list
[pdf-embedder url=”https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/18-Aug-2022-List.pdf” title=”18 Aug 2022 List”]
Follow:
- Next story At this juncture, it is represented by M.Velmurugan, learned counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent submits that he withdraws his Vakalat and he is no more counsel for R3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor is directed to serve notice on Ramya / 3rd respondent to appear before this Court on the next date of hearing. List this matter on 18.08.2022 at 2.15pm. (S.V.N. J.,) (A.D.J.C. J.,) 16.08.2022 tsh Note: Registry is directed to mark a copy of this order to The Inspector General of Registration, R.A.Puram, Chennai.
- Previous story THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA H.C.P.No.580 of 2022 Selladurai Petitioner : M/s.G.Anabayachozhan For respondents : Mr.M.Babu Muthumeeran, Addl. Public Prosecutor for R1 & R2. Mr.V.Ramana Reddy for R3. Mr.R.Rajaramani for R4.
Recent Posts
- 0:05] Vinothpandian: 2019 (6) : Dr swapan kumar banerjee vs state of west bengal : mere fact that wife did not file petition for grant of maintenance during pendency of matrimonial proceedings would not disentitle her to claim maintenance ( section 125 CRPC 1973 )
- Hon’ble Mr. Justice Krishnan Ramasamy issued the interim stay after hearing Mr. P. Wilson, senior advocate representing the government company. The petitioner, TACTV, challenged the demand made by the Joint
- Observing that the Tamil Nadu Police Department lags behind in leveraging information technology, the Madras High Court has directed it to ensure that the entire process of a criminal case, right from the stage of receipt of a complaint till the delivery of judgment,
- [02/05, 08:49] sekarreporter1: Justice A.D. Jagadish Chandira took serious note of the long delay in implementing the Crime and Criminal Tracking Network & Systems (CCTNS) 2.0 project by the State Police Department and ordered that it should be put in place within four months, failing which the department must come up with a valid justification. [02/05, 08:49] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxDwdh_rbwBeP8xNXfKlXK8_fpAWoayz-k?si=nG07y9CgpwuuVoE_
- குலுங்க குலுங்க சிரித்த நீதிபதிகள்
More
Recent Posts
- 0:05] Vinothpandian: 2019 (6) : Dr swapan kumar banerjee vs state of west bengal : mere fact that wife did not file petition for grant of maintenance during pendency of matrimonial proceedings would not disentitle her to claim maintenance ( section 125 CRPC 1973 )
- Hon’ble Mr. Justice Krishnan Ramasamy issued the interim stay after hearing Mr. P. Wilson, senior advocate representing the government company. The petitioner, TACTV, challenged the demand made by the Joint
- Observing that the Tamil Nadu Police Department lags behind in leveraging information technology, the Madras High Court has directed it to ensure that the entire process of a criminal case, right from the stage of receipt of a complaint till the delivery of judgment,
- [02/05, 08:49] sekarreporter1: Justice A.D. Jagadish Chandira took serious note of the long delay in implementing the Crime and Criminal Tracking Network & Systems (CCTNS) 2.0 project by the State Police Department and ordered that it should be put in place within four months, failing which the department must come up with a valid justification. [02/05, 08:49] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxDwdh_rbwBeP8xNXfKlXK8_fpAWoayz-k?si=nG07y9CgpwuuVoE_
- குலுங்க குலுங்க சிரித்த நீதிபதிகள்
