Land grabing case nkj bench order Jaya TV news video
Follow:
- Next story Facilitating late-filing of Income Tax returns is service: Madras HC upholds Section 234 (F) of IT Act prescribing Fee for default in timely filing of returns Chief Justice AP Sahi and Subramonium Prasad, however, disagreed. Rather, the Court found merit in the arguments advanced by the State authorities that the “service” involved is facility allowing late-payers to file their income returns beyond the prescribed date. As stated in the judgmentAdvocate S Santhosh appeared for the petitioner. Additional Solicitor General G Rajagopalan appeared for the Union of India and Advocate Hema Muralikrishnan appeared for the Central Board of Direct Taxes.
- Previous story W.P.No.2816 of 2020 and W.M.P.No.3260 of 2020 N.KIRUBAKARAN, J. and R.PONGIAPPAN, J. (Order of the Court was made by N.KIRUBAKARAN,J.) 8.This Court is of the view that this case is only the tip of the iceberg. There are many Government properties and poramboke lands being knocked away by private parties viz., land grabbers by using political influence, money power, muscle power and in collusion with the Government officials. The value of the lands have now gone up and therefore, the lands have to be preserved for public purposes. Otherwise, the land grabbers will swallow the properties and unjustly enrich themselves. Therefore, this Court, Suo Motu impleads,
Recent Posts
- சமரசம்/pmk Ramadoss பாட்டாளி மக்கள் கட்சியின் தலைவராக தன்னை அறிவிக்க கோரி தொடர்ந்து வழக்கை திரும்ப பெற்றார் city court civil court allowed to withdraw case
- Amstrong case sc judge k viswanath bench allowed Tn Govt to withdraw petition sc order cbi to file counter
- குதிரை பேரம் bail judge ilanthiriyan order state pp to file counter
- Not to harash senthil balaji pettion dismissed judge Ilanthiriyan/ state pp john satgya and Senior NR Elango
- appellant is granted liberty to establish his claims for professional fees and agitate his grievances before a competent civil court or appropriate forum. If the appellant chooses to file a civil suit, the time spent bona fide prosecuting the writ petition and this writ appeal shall be excluded for the purpose of computing limitation. There shall be no order as to costs. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J)
More
Recent Posts
- சமரசம்/pmk Ramadoss பாட்டாளி மக்கள் கட்சியின் தலைவராக தன்னை அறிவிக்க கோரி தொடர்ந்து வழக்கை திரும்ப பெற்றார் city court civil court allowed to withdraw case
- Amstrong case sc judge k viswanath bench allowed Tn Govt to withdraw petition sc order cbi to file counter
- குதிரை பேரம் bail judge ilanthiriyan order state pp to file counter
- Not to harash senthil balaji pettion dismissed judge Ilanthiriyan/ state pp john satgya and Senior NR Elango
- appellant is granted liberty to establish his claims for professional fees and agitate his grievances before a competent civil court or appropriate forum. If the appellant chooses to file a civil suit, the time spent bona fide prosecuting the writ petition and this writ appeal shall be excluded for the purpose of computing limitation. There shall be no order as to costs. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J)