Karur court inaguration live
You may also like...
-
Full order THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.(MD).No.13326 of 2012 and M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2012 T.Rajagopal — 17.It is for this purpose, G.O.Ms.No.395, dated 04.09.2018, was brought into force by the Government by creating a Corpus fund. The Government Doctors contribute a certain amount towards this Corpus Fund and whenever a case arises for payment of compensation, the amount can be paid from this Corpus fund without unnecessarily burdening any Doctor or Government Institution. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the considered view that the case of the petitioner will fall within the requirements of Sub Clause II of Clause 4(G). Hence, the petitioner is entitled to be paid compensation under this Government Order to the tune of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs Only). 18. In the result, there shall be a direction to the first respondent to pay a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs only) to the petitioner from the Corpus fund created under G.O.Ms.No.395, dated 04.09.2018, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 19.This petition is allowed accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is
by Sekar Reporter · Published July 2, 2021
-
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR WP.No.8928 of 2013 Dr.E.Chitra … Petitioner. Managing Partner Vs. Territory Manager, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and another reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 1042 and the Honourable Supreme Court has directed the respondent to vacate and hand over the possession. As the respondent Corporation is squatting in the property without paying any rent after expiry of lease in the year 1998, they cannot continue in possession of the property as their possession is nothing but illegal as that of a trespasser and they are bound to vacate the premises. Considering the above position of law, now for the sake of defending their possession, the respondent corporation cannot take a different stand during the submissions that the property belong to wakf and that is also not permissible in law, since they are estopped from denying the title of the landlord. Now it is stated that the licence issued to the dealer also has been suspended due to some irregularities and the same has been challenged. Considering the above facts and circumstances, this Writ Petition is allowed and the respondent is directed to hand over vacant possession of the premises to the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. No costs.
by Sekar Reporter · Published November 9, 2022
-
