You may also like...
-
Conclusion: 48. In view of the facts and circumstances and the legal position as considered in the aforementioned paragraphs, writ orders impugned are not in consonance with the principles settled by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India and on facts. Consequently, writ orders dated 09.01.2015 in W.P.No.26856 of 2010 and W.P.No.19724 of 2005 and writ orders dated 24.01.2011 in W.P.No.17867 of 2010 and W.P. No.20769 of 2010 are set aside. Writ Appeals in W.A.Nos.854 and 1645 of 2015 are allowed and Writ Appeals in W.A.Nos.1549 and 1550 of 2015 and 1529 and 1530 of 2018 are dismissed. The connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. [S.M.S., J.] [M.S.Q., J.] 11.11.2025 Index:Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes/No mmi/Jeni To 1.The Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil Nadu, Housing and Urban Development Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009. 2.The Managing Director, Nandanam, Chennai – 600 035. 3.The Special Tahsildar (Land Acquisition III),
by Sekar Reporter · Published December 6, 2025
-
-
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MR.N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.No.1664 of 2021 and WMP No.1871 of 2021 D.Aswin Rao …Petitioner .Vs. 1.The State rep.by its Additional Chief Secretary, Home Department, Government of Tamilnadu, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai, Vepery, Chennai 600 007. 3.The State rep.by The Inspector of Police, CCB-IPS, Chennai-CCB District-EDF-I Team-II. ..Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to forbear the 2nd and 3rd respondents from passing order against the petitioner now confining at Central Prison, Puzhal by detaining him under the preventive Detention in particularly Tamil Nadu Act No.14 of 1982. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Prabhakaran Senior Counsel for Mr.R.Krishna Kumar For Respondents : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the Respondents from invoking Act 14 of 1982, against the Petitioner.
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 5, 2021
