“Justice M.M. Sundresh and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, while relying on the Apex Court’s ruling in Rajasthan High Court v. Rajat Yadav (2025), reiterated that “a candidate belonging to reserve category who has scored marks higher than the cut off marks for the General Category is to be treated as having qualified against an open or unreserved vacant post”.” https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/supreme-court/airports-authority-of-india-ors-v-sham-krishna-b-ors-2026-insc-69-1604709#:~:text=Justice%20M.M.%20Sundresh%20and,open%20or%20unreserved%20vacant%20post%E2%80%9D.
Ó”Justice M.M. Sundresh and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, while relying on the Apex Court’s ruling in Rajasthan High Court v. Rajat Yadav (2025), reiterated that “a candidate belonging to reserve category who has scored marks higher than the cut off marks for the General Category is to be treated as having qualified against an open or unreserved vacant post”.”
https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/supreme-court/airports-authority-of-india-ors-v-sham-krishna-b-ors-2026-insc-69-1604709#:~:text=Justice%20M.M.%20Sundresh%20and,open%20or%20unreserved%20vacant%20post%E2%80%9D.
