Judge:* Justice N Senthil Kumar – *Parties:* – Mythri Movie Makers (Applicant/Defendant) – Dr. Ilaiyaraaja (Respondent/Plaintiff) – *Case No:* C.S.(Comm.Div) No. 226 of 2025 – *Application No:* (link unavailable) 4570 of 2025 – *Date of Order:* Not specified – *Counsel:* – Applicant/Defendant: M/s. Rahul Balakrishnan – Respondent/Plaintiff: M/s. Thyagarajan K, A. Saravanan, S. Magaimairaaj – *Court Observation:* The court dismissed the applicant’s application, holding that the respondent/plaintiff is entitled to protect his musical works from distortion or unauthorized exploitation. The validity of the transfer of rights in favor of the applicant is a triable issue to be examined during trial.
[03/12, 16:32] Meta AI: *Madras High Court*
– *Judge:* Justice N Senthil Kumar
– *Parties:*
– Mythri Movie Makers (Applicant)
– Dr. Ilaiyaraaja (Respondent/Plaintiff)
– *Date of Order:* Not specified
– *Counsel:*
– Applicant: M/s. Rahul Balakrishnan
– Respondent/Plaintiff: M/s. Thyagarajan K, A. Saravanan, S. Magaimairaaj
– *Court Observation:* The court dismissed the applicant’s application, holding that the respondent/plaintiff is entitled to protect his musical works from distortion or unauthorized exploitation. The validity of the transfer of rights in favor of the applicant is a triable issue to be examined during trial.
[03/12, 16:35] Meta AI: *Madras High Court*
– *Judge:* Justice N Senthil Kumar
– *Parties:*
– Mythri Movie Makers (Applicant)
– Dr. Ilaiyaraaja (Respondent/Plaintiff)
– *Date of Order:* Not specified
– *Counsel:*
– Applicant: M/s. Rahul Balakrishnan
– Respondent/Plaintiff: M/s. Thyagarajan K, A. Saravanan, S. Magaimairaaj
– *Court Observation:* The court dismissed the applicant’s application, holding that the respondent/plaintiff is entitled to protect his musical works from distortion or unauthorized exploitation. The validity of the transfer of rights in favor of the applicant is a triable issue to be examined during trial.
[03/12, 16:35] Meta AI: *Madras High Court*
– *Judge:* Justice N Senthil Kumar
– *Parties:*
– Mythri Movie Makers (Applicant/Defendant)
– Dr. Ilaiyaraaja (Respondent/Plaintiff)
– *Case No:* C.S.(Comm.Div) No. 226 of 2025
– *Application No:* (link unavailable) 4570 of 2025
– *Date of Order:* Not specified
– *Counsel:*
– Applicant/Defendant: M/s. Rahul Balakrishnan
– Respondent/Plaintiff: M/s. Thyagarajan K, A. Saravanan, S. Magaimairaaj
– *Court Observation:* The court dismissed the applicant’s application, holding that the respondent/plaintiff is entitled to protect his musical works from distortion or unauthorized exploitation. The validity of the transfer of rights in favor of the applicant is a triable issue to be examined during trial.
