In order to make these compliance and to file a revised draft plan, as indicated above, the GCC seeks a further week’s time. Hence, post this matter on 08.01.2026 at 02.15 pm for such compliance. (R.S.K., J.) (A.D.J.C., J) 02.01.2026

by Sekar Reporter · Published January 2, 2026 · Updated January 2, 2026

In order to make these compliance and to file a revised draft plan, as indicated above, the GCC seeks a further week’s time. Hence, post this matter on 08.01.2026 at 02.15 pm for such
compliance.
(R.S.K., J.) (A.D.J.C., J)
02.01.2026

Share this post:

Share on X (Twitter) Share on Facebook Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Share on Email

You may also like...

• 

  Consequently, I find all the charges against the accused under Section 120(b) read with Sections 381 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, as well as Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, to be proved. For the proven charges, the Trial Court imposed only the minimum sentence of one year and a fine of Rs.1,000/-, which does not warrant interference. 24. Accordingly, finding no merits, this Criminal Appeal stands dismissed. The appellant is granted twelve weeks time, from the date of receipt of a web-copy of this order, to surrender before the Trial Court to undergo the sentence. 16.09.2025 Neutral Citation : yes grs To 1. The XIII Additional Special Judge for CBI Cases, Chennai. 2. The Inspector of Police, SPE/CBI/ACB/Chennai. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. grs Crl.A.No.385 of 2014 16.09.2025

  September 16, 2025

   by Sekar Reporter · Published September 16, 2025

• 

  [5/25, 19:09] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1264913898031009792?s=08 [5/25, 19:09] Sekarreporter 1: Former minister senthil.balaji case tomorrow hearing last week thus case came up for hearing before justice Nirmal kumar j on behalf of senthil balaji senior advt s Prabakaran argued pp seek time case posted tomorrow

  May 25, 2020

   by Sekar Reporter · Published May 25, 2020

• 

  Bench of Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Justice R. Mahadevan observed that “expectation of a higher bid in a subsequent auction cannot be a reason to cancel an auction held

  January 8, 2026

   by Sekar Reporter · Published January 8, 2026