Human rights commission case
https://youtu.be/mK2eBlyc42g
Follow:
- Next story Smsj full order THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM C.M.S.A.No.27 of 2020 -++-The only question of law raised in the present second appeal is that whether the complaint/application filed by the respondent before the Regulatory Authority is maintainable or not. In view of the fact that the completion certificate issued by the Executive Officer, Town Panchayat is not in consonance either with the provisions of the Town and Country Planning Act as well as the building plan approval sanctioned by the Director of Town and Country Planning or in accordance with the provision of the RERA Act, the same cannot be construed as a valid certificate for the purpose of grant of exclusion under Section 3(2)(b) of the RERA Act. The certificate is to be construed as insignificant and irrelevant as far as the RERA Act is concerned and for all purposes, the building is to be treated as on-going project. Therefore, the appellants/builders are bound to comply with the terms and conditions in the project as well as comply with the provisions of various laws governing real estate affairs. Accordingly, this Court has no hesitation in arriving a conclusion that the application/complaint filed by the respondents/apartment owners association is maintainable under the provisions of the RERA Act, 2016 and accordingly, the order passed by the Appellate Tribunal stands confirmed and consequently, Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal stands dismissed. No costs. The Regulatory Authority is directed to entertain the application/complaint filed by the respondents/apartment owners association and adjudicate the issues on merits and in accordance with law by affording opportunity to all the parties concerned and accordingly, pass speaking final orders within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
- Previous story Judge v parthoban j notice orderedMADURAI Conservancy worker’s wife moves HC for compensation
Recent Posts
- 0:05] Vinothpandian: 2019 (6) : Dr swapan kumar banerjee vs state of west bengal : mere fact that wife did not file petition for grant of maintenance during pendency of matrimonial proceedings would not disentitle her to claim maintenance ( section 125 CRPC 1973 )
- Hon’ble Mr. Justice Krishnan Ramasamy issued the interim stay after hearing Mr. P. Wilson, senior advocate representing the government company. The petitioner, TACTV, challenged the demand made by the Joint
- Observing that the Tamil Nadu Police Department lags behind in leveraging information technology, the Madras High Court has directed it to ensure that the entire process of a criminal case, right from the stage of receipt of a complaint till the delivery of judgment,
- [02/05, 08:49] sekarreporter1: Justice A.D. Jagadish Chandira took serious note of the long delay in implementing the Crime and Criminal Tracking Network & Systems (CCTNS) 2.0 project by the State Police Department and ordered that it should be put in place within four months, failing which the department must come up with a valid justification. [02/05, 08:49] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxDwdh_rbwBeP8xNXfKlXK8_fpAWoayz-k?si=nG07y9CgpwuuVoE_
- குலுங்க குலுங்க சிரித்த நீதிபதிகள்
More
Recent Posts
- 0:05] Vinothpandian: 2019 (6) : Dr swapan kumar banerjee vs state of west bengal : mere fact that wife did not file petition for grant of maintenance during pendency of matrimonial proceedings would not disentitle her to claim maintenance ( section 125 CRPC 1973 )
- Hon’ble Mr. Justice Krishnan Ramasamy issued the interim stay after hearing Mr. P. Wilson, senior advocate representing the government company. The petitioner, TACTV, challenged the demand made by the Joint
- Observing that the Tamil Nadu Police Department lags behind in leveraging information technology, the Madras High Court has directed it to ensure that the entire process of a criminal case, right from the stage of receipt of a complaint till the delivery of judgment,
- [02/05, 08:49] sekarreporter1: Justice A.D. Jagadish Chandira took serious note of the long delay in implementing the Crime and Criminal Tracking Network & Systems (CCTNS) 2.0 project by the State Police Department and ordered that it should be put in place within four months, failing which the department must come up with a valid justification. [02/05, 08:49] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxDwdh_rbwBeP8xNXfKlXK8_fpAWoayz-k?si=nG07y9CgpwuuVoE_
- குலுங்க குலுங்க சிரித்த நீதிபதிகள்
