Follow:
- Next story Setting aside the order, justice G R Swaminathan cited that the prosecution had failed to establish that there was a demand for gratification as the complainant turned hostile. The judge further directed the trial court to initiate proceedings against the complainant and directed the registry to monitor the follow up action taken.
- Previous story Court wonders why paddy procurement from farmers had not taken place so far
Recent Posts
- sekarreporter1: https://x.com/pwilsondmk/status/1934523542277853236?s=46 [16/06, 14:02] sekarreporter1: The summons issued by ED to Mr. Arvind Datar, Senior Counsel to come for
- Mha Ec Gobu: #வழக்கறிஞர்கள் #சமூகநீதிப்பேரவை #சார்பில் #ஆர்ப்பாட்டம். வழக்கறிஞர்
- Biodata of HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
- Quashed MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Crl.O.P.No.14103 of 2025 — 1.Muruganandam 2.Manimaran .. Petitioners
- Murugan conference MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI W.P.CRL.(MD)Nos.110 and 185 of 2025 and WPMPCRL(MD)Nos.26 and 47 of 2025 in WPCRL(MD)No.110 of 2025 Hindu Munnani Rep.by its State Secretary
More
Recent Posts
- sekarreporter1: https://x.com/pwilsondmk/status/1934523542277853236?s=46 [16/06, 14:02] sekarreporter1: The summons issued by ED to Mr. Arvind Datar, Senior Counsel to come for
- Mha Ec Gobu: #வழக்கறிஞர்கள் #சமூகநீதிப்பேரவை #சார்பில் #ஆர்ப்பாட்டம். வழக்கறிஞர்
- Biodata of HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
- Quashed MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Crl.O.P.No.14103 of 2025 — 1.Muruganandam 2.Manimaran .. Petitioners
- Murugan conference MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI W.P.CRL.(MD)Nos.110 and 185 of 2025 and WPMPCRL(MD)Nos.26 and 47 of 2025 in WPCRL(MD)No.110 of 2025 Hindu Munnani Rep.by its State Secretary