You may also like...
-
பாவத்தை சேர்க்காதிங்க Justice G.R Swaminathan observed that the lawyer was merely discharging his professional service in connection with the furnishing of sureties. He had not fabricated or manufactured the documents in question. Full order MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.53 of 2022 and
by Sekar Reporter · Published April 24, 2022
-
6/25, 07:30] Sekarreporter: *GLIMPSE OF A LATEST VERDICT* *C.M.A. No. 615/2018, 4054/2019* Mr. D. Sivakumar Vs. Mrs. Parimala Dated: 11.06.2021 *Hon’ble Justice T. Raja and Justice G. Chandrasekharan* set aside the impugned order with to maintenance but not on order refusing grant of divorce herein in this matter relating to *“
by Sekar Reporter · Published June 25, 2021
-
28. In the result, both the impugned orders i.e., orders passed by the Disciplinary Authority, dated 10.03.1999 as well as the Appellate Authority dated 10.08.1999 are hereby quashed. As a sequel, the petitioner shall be entitled to get service benefits which are available to 27/30 W.P. No. 977 of 2007 him under the relevant service rules. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is allowed as indicated above. However, there shall be no order as to cost. 05.01.2021 Index: Yes Speaking Order: Yes vji 28/30. Judge r sureskumar
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 23, 2021