You may also like...
-
MANUPATRA WEBINAR CLIMATE CHANGE AND THE LAW
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 19, 2020
-
In fine, this Court sets aside the judgment and decree of the first Appellate Judge/II Additional District Judge, Chidambaram, in A.S.No.10 of 2015 dated 03.09.2018 and restores the judgment and decree of trial Judge/Subordinate Judge, Chidambaram. in O.S.No.27 of 2008 dated 06.01.2015 in decreeing the suit in favour of appellants and allows the Second Appeal with the costs of appellants throughout. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, is closed. Mra 31.01.2022 Internet: Yes Index : Yes Speaking/Non speaking order To The II Additional District Judge, Chidambaram. The Subordinate Judge, Chidambaram. G.CHANDRASEKHARAN, J., mra Judgment in S.A.No.733 of 2019 31.01.2022
by Sekar Reporter · Published November 13, 2022
-
Justice K. Murali Shankar observed that during COVID-19 pandemic, the entire country was working virtually. Since the petitioner had not raised any objection before the trial court, he should not take such a stand before the High Court. The Supreme Court had permitted virtual hearing and the High Court had issued various circulars to conduct the cases virtually in view of the pandemic. The complaint that the petitioner was not given an opportunity to argue the case elaborately physically was very much against the orders of the Supreme Court and the High Court, the judge said
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 12, 2021