Gowtham advt –High court set-aside cmm order granting 6 days custody and reduced it to 4 days, bail should b considered on merits on the same day after custody. S. PRABAKARAN, Senior advocate appeared for thiru thanikachalam
Follow:
- Next story Vijayaragan Mhc Advt: Continuing his colourful form with the gavel, Justice Anand Venkatesh, has scored another scintillating knock, during these Pandemic times. Not resting on his laurels, dispensing with the requirement of ‘decree drafting’ in motor accidents claims, by orders dt.11/5/2020, in existence for 64 long years, he has now stepped into a 17 year old vintage vexed issue.
- Previous story Sidda Dr custody not quashed The case against Thiru Thanickachalam was registered u/s 188, 153a, 505 etc. It was argued by the learned senior counsel that all the sections are bailable except 505 IPC and section 505 does not attract at all, section 41-A circular issued by the DGP and the judgment of the madras high court was violated and similar cases under section 505 registered by various police stations in the state of tamilnadu for posting videos in the web site were granted instant bail, but in this case the state is taking special interest and taking him to police custody and harrasing the petitioner. The state public prosecutor argued that it is very serious in nature the video post by the accused will provoke the general public and asked for dismissal, the honble court upon hearing both side arguments was pleased to set-aside the order passed by the learned cmm and ordered for 4 days custody and to consider the bail petition on the same day after custody.
Recent Posts
- Why Remand Rejected? – Legal Grounds* **Ground** **Explanation** **Sec 167(1) CrPC** *Magistrate must be satisfied custodial interrogation is necessary* **D.K. Basu 1997 SC** *Liberty under Art 21. Remand is exception* **Anupam Kulkarni 1992 SC** *Police custody only if new facts to be discovered* **Status of Accused** *Officer of
- Madras High Court Allows Dynamic Blocking Of Pirated Content of YRF’s ‘Alpha’ Starring Alia Bhatt
- நாகப்பட்டினம் மாவட்டத்தில் உள்ள திரவுபதி அம்மன் கோவில் அறங்காவலர் குழு தலைவர் பதவிக்கான தேர்தலுக்கு தடை ஐகோர்ட்டு உத்தரவு
- Remand rejected for accused Dmk advt A Damodaran former add pp argued [05/07, 07:44] Meta AI: *Case #132: _A. Damodaran – Remand Rejected_ | http://Crl.MP ___/2026 | Madras HC / Sessions | 05.07.2026* _Source: YouTube – shared by SekarReporter1, 05/07/2026 07:43 AM_. *Sec 167 CrPC + Remand Law*. *HJS Criminal Law*
- 20.Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with heavy cost of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh only) payable to the High Court Legal Services Authority within a period of six (6) weeks from today. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. (Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.) (N.MALA, J.) 08.06.2026
More
Recent Posts
- Why Remand Rejected? – Legal Grounds* **Ground** **Explanation** **Sec 167(1) CrPC** *Magistrate must be satisfied custodial interrogation is necessary* **D.K. Basu 1997 SC** *Liberty under Art 21. Remand is exception* **Anupam Kulkarni 1992 SC** *Police custody only if new facts to be discovered* **Status of Accused** *Officer of
- Madras High Court Allows Dynamic Blocking Of Pirated Content of YRF’s ‘Alpha’ Starring Alia Bhatt
- நாகப்பட்டினம் மாவட்டத்தில் உள்ள திரவுபதி அம்மன் கோவில் அறங்காவலர் குழு தலைவர் பதவிக்கான தேர்தலுக்கு தடை ஐகோர்ட்டு உத்தரவு
- Remand rejected for accused Dmk advt A Damodaran former add pp argued [05/07, 07:44] Meta AI: *Case #132: _A. Damodaran – Remand Rejected_ | http://Crl.MP ___/2026 | Madras HC / Sessions | 05.07.2026* _Source: YouTube – shared by SekarReporter1, 05/07/2026 07:43 AM_. *Sec 167 CrPC + Remand Law*. *HJS Criminal Law*
- 20.Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with heavy cost of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh only) payable to the High Court Legal Services Authority within a period of six (6) weeks from today. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. (Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.) (N.MALA, J.) 08.06.2026