You may also like...
-
Vinothpandian: Supreme court : Patricia Mukhim vs state of meghalaya @ SLP no ( cri ) 103 of 2021 dated 25 – 03 – 2021 : Unless speech has tendency to affect public order, free speech of a person cannot be stifled by implicating in criminal case ( freedom of speech)
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 30, 2021
-
S m subramaniyam judge –Thus, this Court has no hesitation in holding that the findings of the Railway Claims Tribunal in its order dated 14.03.2019 is not in consonance with the provisions of Section 79 of the Railways Act, 1989 and further the appreciation of facts and circumstances, interpretations of the provisions as well as the reasonings are also not in accordance with the established principles of law. Accordingly, the 35/38 [2/21, 17:39] Sekarreporter1: C.M.A.No.3545 of 2019 order impugned is liable to be set aside.
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 21, 2021
-
Observing that documents cannot be taken as evidence by court without cross examination, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a plea filed by a woman seeking compensation from the State government after she was ‘wrongly’ tested positive for HIV by the government headquarters hospital in Virudhunagar.
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 12, 2020