You may also like...
-
Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and M.M. Sundresh allowed an appeal assailing the order of Uttarakhand High Court, which permitted the writ petition filed IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SANJAY KISHAN KAUL; M.M. SUNDRESH, JJ. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2661 OF 2015; April 07, 2022 State of Uttarakhand Versus Sudhir Budakoti & Ors.
by Sekar Reporter · Published April 9, 2022
-
-
[15/03, 08:03] sekarreporter1: “Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy observed, “As discussed earlier, the earlier invoices contain a pictorial depiction of Lord Ayyappa, which does not tally with the pictorial depiction in the registered mark. They also contain the trading name of the first respondent. Such trading name is, however, not written within the ring surrounding the pictorial depiction of Lord Ayyappa, as is the case in the registered trademark. Nonetheless, it cannot be said that the alteration substantially affects the identity. Therefore, I conclude that use” https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/high-courts/madras-high-court/2026-mhc-1056-sree-lakshmi-balaji-industries-v-sri-lakshmi-venkateswara-rice-industries-1609915#:~:text=Justice%20Senthilkumar%20Ramamoorthy%20observed,I%20conclude%20that%20use [15/03, 08:03] Meta AI: Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy கூறினார்: லோகோவில் சிறு மாற்றம் அடையாளத்தை பெரிதாக பாதிக்கவில்லை, ஆகவே பயன்படுத்தல் ஏற்றுக்கொள்ளத்தக்கது.【https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/high-courts/madras-high-court/2026-mhc-1056-sree-lakshmi-balaji-industries-v-sri-lakshmi-venkateswara-rice-industries-1609915】
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 15, 2026