You may also like...
-
Even if the earlier order on cognizance was wrong, the complainant ought to have challenged the same and any infirmity could not be cured in a protest petition filed for taking re-cognizance. 30. In view of the aforesaid discussion, as the order dated 10.10.2023 amounts to taking re-cognizance, the impugned order as well as the order dated 10.10.2023 are set aside
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 16, 2025
-
Senior Advocate K. Subramanian, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, alleged that the initial order was later deleted, and a modified order was uploaded in its place. The operative portion, containing a direction issued to the respondent to deposit Rs 115 crores in Indian Bank Annanagar, Chennai trust, was deleted, claimed Subramanian. He explained –
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 24, 2022
-
ECONOMY EXTERNAL AFFAIRS SECURITY CULTURE OPINION VIDEO ANALYSIS MEDIA GOVERNMENT WORLD EDITOR’S PICK TOP STORIES LIVE WIRE SCIENCE ABOUT USLawDalveer Bhandari Hasn’t Been Elected ICJ ‘Chief Justice’, as Posts Praising PM Modi ClaimJustice Dalveer Bhandari is a member-judge at the ICJ
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 27, 2021


