Chakra film stayed mhc
https://youtu.be/Nev1Z6AkRXY
![[7/30, 12:41] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1288733268028792833?s=08 [7/30, 12:43] Sekarreporter 1: *Madras HC Madurai Bench allows re-postmortem of the body of Tenkasi farmer who allegedly died in the custody of Kadayam forest range officials last week. The interim order was passed in a petition filed by the victim’s wife seeking re-postmortem & CB-CID probe https://t.co/8GPIRg1tbm](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story Madras HC orders interim stay on Vishal’s ‘Chakra’ release over copyright claim
- Previous story Sivaganga election case
Recent Posts
- Justice A.D. Jagadish Chandira of #MadrasHighCourt has directed Tamil Nadu government to pay a compensation of ₹10 lakh each to three minor boys who were subjected to aggravated penetrative sexual assault by none other than their fathers over a long period of time. Impressing upon the need for trial courts to order compensation in such incestuous abuse cases since
- sekarreporter1: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/investing/markets/markets-news/Tipranks/2345278/beardsell-wins-appeal-battle-to-protect-core-trademark-in-madras-high-court/ [08/06, 11:16] sekarreporter1: Home Canada Business Investing
- The Madras High Court held that the impugned order imposing General Penalty under Section 125 of the TNGST Act, 2017 could not be sustained in law because the default alleged against the petitioner, namely delayed filing of Annual Returns for FY 2020-21, was already specifically dealt with by Section 47 of the GST enactments, which prescribes Late Fee for such
- First Division Bench of Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Justice G. Arul Murugan directed the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) officer to respond to the contempt plea by July 2, 2026. They, however, dispensed with his personal appearance before the court for now.
- Counsel for Appellants: Mr. R. Palaniandavan Counsel for Respondents: Mr.Perumpulavil Radhakrishnan, Mr.P.T.Perumal Case Title: Sun TV Network Limited v R Sukanya and Others Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 244 Case No: AS No. 971 of 2015
More
Recent Posts
- Justice A.D. Jagadish Chandira of #MadrasHighCourt has directed Tamil Nadu government to pay a compensation of ₹10 lakh each to three minor boys who were subjected to aggravated penetrative sexual assault by none other than their fathers over a long period of time. Impressing upon the need for trial courts to order compensation in such incestuous abuse cases since
- sekarreporter1: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/investing/markets/markets-news/Tipranks/2345278/beardsell-wins-appeal-battle-to-protect-core-trademark-in-madras-high-court/ [08/06, 11:16] sekarreporter1: Home Canada Business Investing
- The Madras High Court held that the impugned order imposing General Penalty under Section 125 of the TNGST Act, 2017 could not be sustained in law because the default alleged against the petitioner, namely delayed filing of Annual Returns for FY 2020-21, was already specifically dealt with by Section 47 of the GST enactments, which prescribes Late Fee for such
- First Division Bench of Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Justice G. Arul Murugan directed the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) officer to respond to the contempt plea by July 2, 2026. They, however, dispensed with his personal appearance before the court for now.
- Counsel for Appellants: Mr. R. Palaniandavan Counsel for Respondents: Mr.Perumpulavil Radhakrishnan, Mr.P.T.Perumal Case Title: Sun TV Network Limited v R Sukanya and Others Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 244 Case No: AS No. 971 of 2015