Category: Uncategorized

Order setaside THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN WP(MD)No.29610 of 2025 Arsha Vidya Parampara Trust A Public Charitable Trust registered under the Indian Trusts Act, 1882, having its registered office at Vimal B/G-03, through its Chief Functionary/Managing Trustee, Swami Sarvananda Saraswati … Petitioner

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.12.2025 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN WP(MD)No.29610 of 2025 Arsha Vidya Parampara Trust A Public Charitable Trust registered under the Indian Trusts Act, 1882, having...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Chief court adj case regarding. PRAYER It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Declaration or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction, declaring that Section 63(4)(c) of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, in so far as it mandates the production of a hash value and an expert certificate as a condition for admissibility of electronic records, is arbitrary, unreasonable, and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently be declared unconstitutional.

10:48 X KB/S 4:0059160% pecomes unnt for examination because of the non-avanability of proper electronic storage facilities. This defeats the very purpose 33 for which the defence seeks verification, including the disclosure of the...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Judges RSureskumar and Jegathes chandra in marina beach video

Judges RSureskumar and Jegathes chandra in marina beach video

[22/12, 10:32] Sekarreporter: [22/12, 10:32] Sekarreporter: [22/12, 10:32] Sekarreporter: 👍 [22/12, 10:33] Sekarreporter: நீதிபதிகள் சுரேஸ்குமார் ஜெகதீஸ் சந்திரா ஆகியோர் மெரீனா கடற்கரையை காலை பார்வையிட்டனர்

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

The Supreme Court has upheld the dismissal of a CISF constable, Pranab Kumar Nath, who contracted a second marriage while his first wife was alive, violating Rule 18(b) of the CISF Rules, 2001. The court emphasized that the High Court erred in exercising its power of judicial review and interfered with the punishment imposed by the Disciplinary Authority.

The Supreme Court has upheld the dismissal of a CISF constable, Pranab Kumar Nath, who contracted a second marriage while his first wife was alive, violating Rule 18(b) of the CISF Rules, 2001. The...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

division bench of Justice G R Swaminathan and Justice B Pugalendhi observed that they are not impressed by the invocation of public interest by the authorities. The court has consistently held that the integrity of water bodies should not be compromised.

” Read ePaper News Madurai TOI Games Live Videos World India Life & Style Entertainment Business Tech Cricket Sports TV Web Series Education Speaking Tree Voice Of Conscience TOI Newsletters TOI Flashreads Trending Delhi...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version