SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Category: Uncategorized

நீதிபதி பி.டி.ஆஷா அவர்கள் முன்பு விசாரணைக்கு வந்தது. மனுதாரர் வழக்கறிஞர் மற்றும் பேராசிரியர் சுப.வீரபாண்டியன் சார்பில் வழக்கறிஞர் சு.குமார தேவன், கவிஞர் கலி.பூங்குன்றன் சார்பில் த.வீரசேகரன், விடுதலை ராஜேந்திரன்

Uncategorized

 by · Published January 9, 2026

நீதிபதி பி.டி.ஆஷா அவர்கள் முன்பு விசாரணைக்கு வந்தது. மனுதாரர் வழக்கறிஞர் மற்றும் பேராசிரியர் சுப.வீரபாண்டியன் சார்பில் வழக்கறிஞர் சு.குமார தேவன், கவிஞர் கலி.பூங்குன்றன் சார்பில் த.வீரசேகரன், விடுதலை ராஜேந்திரன்

*பேராசிரியர் சுப.வீரபாண்டியன் கவிஞர் கலி.பூங்குன்றன் ஆகியோருக்குக் கொடுக்கப்பட்ட பெரியார் விருதை எதிர்த்து தாக்கல் செய்த ரிட் மனுவை தள்ளுபடி செய்து சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவு.* தமிழ்நாடு அரசால் கடந்த 1996 ஆம் ஆண்டு முதல் தந்தை பெரியார் பெயரில் விருதுகள் பெரியாரின் கொள்கைகள் பரப்புவோருக்கு வழங்கப்பட்டு வருகிறது....

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published January 9, 2026

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WP No. 47905 of 2025 Sri Kanchi Kamakoti Peetham, Represented by its Manager, Mr.V.Vaidyanathan, Srimatam Samasthanam, No.1, Salai Street, Kancheepuram – 631 502. Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest and Chief Wildlife Warden, Department of Forests,

2026:MHC:105 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07-01-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WP No. 47905 of 2025 Sri Kanchi Kamakoti Peetham, Represented by its Manager, Mr.V.Vaidyanathan, Srimatam Samasthanam, No.1,...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published January 9, 2026

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN W.P.Nos.6989 and 6993 of 2022 and W.M.P.Nos.7019 and 7025 of 2022 W.P.No.6989 of 2022 1. Shanmugha Arts, Science Technology & Research Academy (SASTRA) Deemed University, Thirumalaisamudram, Thanjavur – 613 402

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on 06.01.2026 Pronounced on 09.01.2026 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN W.P.Nos.6989 and 6993 of 2022 and...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published January 9, 2026

HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN C.M.P.No.821 of 2026 in W.A.No.94 of 2026 1.Central Board of Film Certification Films Division Complex,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09.01.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN C.M.P.No.821 of 2026 in W.A.No.94 of 2026 1.Central Board...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published January 9, 2026

Waqf orderTHE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.P.No.49241 of 2025 & W.M.P.No.55011 of 2025 Y. Shoukath Ali Mohamed S/o.N.Mohmed Yusuf Muslim Aged About 53 Years Old No.16 New No.44, 2nd Floor Papanasam Sivan Road, Santhome Chennai 600004. Petitioner(s)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08.01.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.P.No.49241 of 2025 & W.M.P.No.55011 of 2025 Y. Shoukath...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published January 9, 2026

[09/01, 16:55] Sekarreporter: Mr. Satish Parasaran requested the Chief Justice to upload the Division Bench’s order copy at the earliest. The CJ agreed, with a light-hearted laugh clearly aware that the production house needs the order copy to move the Supreme Court. [09/01, 16:59] Sekarreporter: Court said there was no real urgency in the matter. Chief Justice: We will pass appropriate orders, but until then, this order cannot be given effect to.

[09/01, 16:55] Sekarreporter: Mr. Satish Parasaran requested the Chief Justice to upload the Division Bench’s order copy at the earliest. The CJ agreed, with a light-hearted laugh clearly aware that the production house needs...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
[09/01, 16:29] Sekarreporter: AR L Sundaresan asks them to read para 27 of the single judge’s order. Says, single judge had moulded the relief and quashed the CBFC chairman’s decision though the petitioner had not made any such prayer. He says application for certification was made only on Dec 18 [09/01, 16:30] Sekarreporter: ASG: The producers applied for certification only on December 18 and the CBFC communicated its decision to them on December 22. #JanaNayagan [09/01, 16:31] Sekarreporter: ASG: We produced the complaint received from Bombay and submitted it in a sealed envelope on the 7th. The matter was heard on the afternoon of the 7th, and orders were passed today. [09/01, 16:34] Sekarreporter: Chief Justice asks how can single judge pass an order without giving an opportunity for CBFC to file a counter affidavit? He asks how can the producer fix date of release even before issuance of censor certificate? Is CBFC not entitled to file 2/3 days time to file reply? he asks [09/01, 16:35] Sekarreporter: Chief Justice asks how can single judge pass an order without giving an opportunity for CBFC to file a counter affidavit? He asks how can the producer fix date of release even before issuance of censor certificate? Is CBFC not entitled to file 2/3 days time to file reply? he asks [09/01, 16:36] Sekarreporter: Rohatgi says that the movie was to be released on 9th Jan Court says the producers could’ve waited for the certificate CJ: You’re creating an urgency and putting pressure on court #JanaNayaganCensor #JanaNayagan #MadrasHC [09/01, 16:38] Sekarreporter: SG Tushar Mehta: If the court moulds the relief in this manner, it would effectively make the provisions of the Cinematograph Act meaningless and redundant. #JanaNayagan [09/01, 16:38] Sekarreporter: SG Tushar Mehta: If the court moulds the relief in this manner, it would effectively make the provisions of the Cinematograph Act meaningless and redundant. #JanaNayagan [09/01, 16:40] Sekarreporter: CJ: A false sense of urgency is being created by saying the film must be released on a particular date. The January 6 order was not under challenge, yet it has now been questioned. #JanaNayagan [09/01, 16:41] Sekarreporter: Mr. Satish Parasaran, also for KVN Productions LLP, requests the Chief Justice to kindly read the single judge’s order once again. [09/01, 16:41] Sekarreporter: Mr. Parasaran says, the CBFC regional officer had conveyed to the producer on December 22 that Board had decided to issue UA certificate. However, CJ says when certificate was not in hand, the producer should have waited for sometime than announcing the release date. [09/01, 16:42] Sekarreporter: CJ asks how can single judge simply direct CBFC to produce records and pass orders without giving time to file a counter affidavit. [09/01, 16:42] Sekarreporter: CJ says they will not allow the single judge’s order to be given effect to [09/01, 16:45] Sekarreporter: Mr. Rohatgi says on Dec 22 CBFC Regional Officer conveyed that examining committee had agreed to issue U/A 16+ certificate. So, the excisions were made and entire process required for certification got over on December 29 and therefore, the date of release was fixed. [09/01, 16:52] Sekarreporter: Order: The respondents contend that there was no real urgency in the matter. In any event, it is noted that no censor certificate had been granted to the respondents. [09/01, 16:55] Sekarreporter: Mr. Satish Parasaran requested the Chief Justice to upload the Division Bench’s order copy at the earliest. The CJ agreed, with a light-hearted laugh clearly aware that the production house needs the order copy to move the Supreme Court.

Uncategorized

 by · Published January 9, 2026

[09/01, 16:29] Sekarreporter: AR L Sundaresan asks them to read para 27 of the single judge’s order. Says, single judge had moulded the relief and quashed the CBFC chairman’s decision though the petitioner had not made any such prayer. He says application for certification was made only on Dec 18 [09/01, 16:30] Sekarreporter: ASG: The producers applied for certification only on December 18 and the CBFC communicated its decision to them on December 22. #JanaNayagan [09/01, 16:31] Sekarreporter: ASG: We produced the complaint received from Bombay and submitted it in a sealed envelope on the 7th. The matter was heard on the afternoon of the 7th, and orders were passed today. [09/01, 16:34] Sekarreporter: Chief Justice asks how can single judge pass an order without giving an opportunity for CBFC to file a counter affidavit? He asks how can the producer fix date of release even before issuance of censor certificate? Is CBFC not entitled to file 2/3 days time to file reply? he asks [09/01, 16:35] Sekarreporter: Chief Justice asks how can single judge pass an order without giving an opportunity for CBFC to file a counter affidavit? He asks how can the producer fix date of release even before issuance of censor certificate? Is CBFC not entitled to file 2/3 days time to file reply? he asks [09/01, 16:36] Sekarreporter: Rohatgi says that the movie was to be released on 9th Jan Court says the producers could’ve waited for the certificate CJ: You’re creating an urgency and putting pressure on court #JanaNayaganCensor #JanaNayagan #MadrasHC [09/01, 16:38] Sekarreporter: SG Tushar Mehta: If the court moulds the relief in this manner, it would effectively make the provisions of the Cinematograph Act meaningless and redundant. #JanaNayagan [09/01, 16:38] Sekarreporter: SG Tushar Mehta: If the court moulds the relief in this manner, it would effectively make the provisions of the Cinematograph Act meaningless and redundant. #JanaNayagan [09/01, 16:40] Sekarreporter: CJ: A false sense of urgency is being created by saying the film must be released on a particular date. The January 6 order was not under challenge, yet it has now been questioned. #JanaNayagan [09/01, 16:41] Sekarreporter: Mr. Satish Parasaran, also for KVN Productions LLP, requests the Chief Justice to kindly read the single judge’s order once again. [09/01, 16:41] Sekarreporter: Mr. Parasaran says, the CBFC regional officer had conveyed to the producer on December 22 that Board had decided to issue UA certificate. However, CJ says when certificate was not in hand, the producer should have waited for sometime than announcing the release date. [09/01, 16:42] Sekarreporter: CJ asks how can single judge simply direct CBFC to produce records and pass orders without giving time to file a counter affidavit. [09/01, 16:42] Sekarreporter: CJ says they will not allow the single judge’s order to be given effect to [09/01, 16:45] Sekarreporter: Mr. Rohatgi says on Dec 22 CBFC Regional Officer conveyed that examining committee had agreed to issue U/A 16+ certificate. So, the excisions were made and entire process required for certification got over on December 29 and therefore, the date of release was fixed. [09/01, 16:52] Sekarreporter: Order: The respondents contend that there was no real urgency in the matter. In any event, it is noted that no censor certificate had been granted to the respondents. [09/01, 16:55] Sekarreporter: Mr. Satish Parasaran requested the Chief Justice to upload the Division Bench’s order copy at the earliest. The CJ agreed, with a light-hearted laugh clearly aware that the production house needs the order copy to move the Supreme Court.

[09/01, 16:29] Sekarreporter: AR L Sundaresan asks them to read para 27 of the single judge’s order. Says, single judge had moulded the relief and quashed the CBFC chairman’s decision though the petitioner had...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version