You may also like...
-
[9/26, 13:01] sekarreporter1: Writ Appeal dismissed. [9/26, 13:01] sekarreporter1: Appellants’ claim for ryotwari patta is rejected due to their failure to establish ryot status under the Act and their belated assertion of pre-existing rights. The 3rd respondent’s lapses in adhering to due procedure further undermine their case, while the actions of the 1st respondents are deemed legally sound. ryotwari patta case full order In conclusion, the Appellants’ claim for ryotwari patta is rejected due to their failure to establish ryot status under the Act and their belated assertion of pre-existing rights. The 3rd respondent’s lapses in adhering to due procedure further undermine their case, while the actions of the 1st respondents are deemed legally sound. In the result, the intra-Court appeal fails and is accordingly dimissed. No costs. Connected Miscellenous Petition is closed. [D.K.K., J.,] [P.B.B., J.] 25 .09.2023 Index:yes Internet:yes Speaking order ak To 1.The Special Commissioner and Commissioner for Land Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai-600005. 2.The Settlement Officer, Office of the Commissioner and Director of Survey and Settlement, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai-600005. 3.The Assistant Settlement Officer (North) Thiruvannamalai – 2 Thiruvannamalai Town and Panchayat. 4.The Tahsildar, Thirukalukundram, Thirukalukundram Taluk, Kancheepuram District. D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J., & P.B.BALAJI, J. ak Pre-Delivery Judgement in W.A.No.1748 of 2015 and M.P. No. 1 of 2015 25.09.2023
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 26, 2023
-
Shri.Atmaram Nadkarni, Additional Solicitor General of India, Supreme Court lecture
by Sekar Reporter · Published June 8, 2020
-
Madras high court orders january 14
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 14, 2022