Ayyappamani Advt Bar Council: Respected Lordship Happy birthday wishes

by Sekar Reporter · May 16, 2020

• 

[5/16, 08:26] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1261490554359013376?s=08
[5/16, 08:26] Sekarreporter 1: [5/16, 08:20] Ayyappamani Advt Bar Council: Respected Lordship Happy birthday wishes
[5/16, 08:25] Sekarreporter 1: 🍁

Share this post:

Share on X (Twitter) Share on Facebook Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Share on Email

You may also like...

• 

  Archagar case full orderTHE HONOURABLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA (MD).No.15739 of 2021 and W.P.No.16287 of 2021 and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.12688 and 12689 of 2021 and  W.M.P.Nos.14511 of 2022 and 17238 and 17241 of 2021 — For petitioner in W.P.(MD).No.15739 of 2021 : Mr.R.Singaravelan, Senior Counsel              for M/s.D.Selvanayagam For petitioner in W.P.No.16287 of 2021          : Mr.P.Valliappan for   M/s.P.V.Law Associates For respondents in W.P.(MD).No.15739 of 2021: Mr.R.Shanmugasundaram, Advocate General, assisted by Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan,Spl.G.P. and Ms.A.G.Shakeena Mr.S.Manuraj  for the proposed intervenor For respondents in W.P.No.16287 of 2021:   Mr.R.Shanmugasundaram, Advocate General, assisted by Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan,Spl.G.P. & Ms.A.G.Shakeena for RR-1 & 2 COMMON  ORDER (Common Order of the Court was made by The Honourable The Chief Justice) A batch of Writ Petitions has been filed to challenge the action of the respondents in regard to the appointment of Archakas in different Temples. –

  July 4, 2022

   by Sekar Reporter · Published July 4, 2022

• 

  தந்தை, மகனுக்காக வழக்கறிஞர்கள் ஆஜராக மறுப்பு: தமிழ்நாடு பார் கவுன்சில் செயலர் பதிலளிக்க உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவு judge pugalenthi

  September 25, 2021

   by Sekar Reporter · Published September 25, 2021

• 

  [7/1, 16:26] sekarreporter 9445430817: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1278281253012115459?s=08 [7/1, 16:26] sekarreporter 9445430817: [7/1, 16:18] Lita Srinivasan: maintainability of the GO transferring the case to CBI .. requesting the government to rescind the order .. An offence under section 302 IPC is not a notified offence under section 3 of Delhi Special Police Establishment Act , 1946 and hence the request for seeking investigation by CBI is a misapprehension . Held in the case of Saroja Vs State of TN and 6 others by JKJ and reported in 1990 LW (crl) 335 .. Lita Srinivasan [7/1, 16:23] sekarreporter 9445430817: 🙏🏾

  July 1, 2020

   by Sekar Reporter · Published July 1, 2020