SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Author: Sekar Reporter

: Letter ROC.NO.201/2020/AGVIV uattu 27 6. From the Advocate General of Tamil Nadu, Letter ROC.No.203/2026/AGVN dated 29.05.2026. 7. From the Advocate General of Tamil Nadu, Letter ROC.No.230/2026/AGVN dated 05.06.2026. ORDER: In the circumstances stated by the learned Advocate General of Tamil Nadu in the letter 7th read above, the Government hereby appoint the following advocates as temporary Law Officers in the rank of “Government Advocates (Criminal Side)” to represent the Government before the High Court of Madras under rule 5(11) of the Law Officers of High Court of Madras and its Bench at Madurai (Appointment), Rules, 2017:- High Court of Madras SI. No. Name of the Advocate Enrolment No. Post 1 Ms.R.S.Indira MS 171/2010 Thiru. M.Mohamed MS 1492/2002 Temporary Law Officers in the rank of 2 Riyaz 2 3 Thiru.M.M.I.Khaleel MS 200/2011 4 Government Thiru. Durai MS 1128/2004 Advocates (Criminal Side), High Court of Madras, Chennai. Gunasekaran 2. The Government further order that the advocates appointed in agraph 1 above shall be paid retainer fee and the appearance fee as per 2nd read above. (BY ORDER OF THE GOVERNOR) K.MANIVASAN ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT Advocates concerned rough the Deputy Director, ffice of the Advocate General, Tamil Nadu, High Court, Chennai-104. Advocate General of Tamil Nadu, Chennai-104. Registrar General, High Court, Chennai-104. Additional Registrar General, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, adurai- 625 023. Deputy Director, Ce of the Advocate General, Tamil Nadu, High Court, Chennai-104. ublic Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai-104. State Government Pleader, High Court of Madras, Chennai-104. Government Pleader, Madurai Bench of High Court of Madras adurai 625 023. Comment Highlight Underline Strikethrough Draw 00 00 More tools

Uncategorized

 by · Published June 17, 2026

: Letter ROC.NO.201/2020/AGVIV uattu 27 6. From the Advocate General of Tamil Nadu, Letter ROC.No.203/2026/AGVN dated 29.05.2026. 7. From the Advocate General of Tamil Nadu, Letter ROC.No.230/2026/AGVN dated 05.06.2026. ORDER: In the circumstances stated by the learned Advocate General of Tamil Nadu in the letter 7th read above, the Government hereby appoint the following advocates as temporary Law Officers in the rank of “Government Advocates (Criminal Side)” to represent the Government before the High Court of Madras under rule 5(11) of the Law Officers of High Court of Madras and its Bench at Madurai (Appointment), Rules, 2017:- High Court of Madras SI. No. Name of the Advocate Enrolment No. Post 1 Ms.R.S.Indira MS 171/2010 Thiru. M.Mohamed MS 1492/2002 Temporary Law Officers in the rank of 2 Riyaz 2 3 Thiru.M.M.I.Khaleel MS 200/2011 4 Government Thiru. Durai MS 1128/2004 Advocates (Criminal Side), High Court of Madras, Chennai. Gunasekaran 2. The Government further order that the advocates appointed in agraph 1 above shall be paid retainer fee and the appearance fee as per 2nd read above. (BY ORDER OF THE GOVERNOR) K.MANIVASAN ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT Advocates concerned rough the Deputy Director, ffice of the Advocate General, Tamil Nadu, High Court, Chennai-104. Advocate General of Tamil Nadu, Chennai-104. Registrar General, High Court, Chennai-104. Additional Registrar General, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, adurai- 625 023. Deputy Director, Ce of the Advocate General, Tamil Nadu, High Court, Chennai-104. ublic Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai-104. State Government Pleader, High Court of Madras, Chennai-104. Government Pleader, Madurai Bench of High Court of Madras adurai 625 023. Comment Highlight Underline Strikethrough Draw 00 00 More tools

: Letter ROC.NO.201/2020/AGVIV uattu 27 6. From the Advocate General of Tamil Nadu, Letter ROC.No.203/2026/AGVN dated 29.05.2026. 7. From the Advocate General of Tamil Nadu, Letter ROC.No.230/2026/AGVN dated 05.06.2026. ORDER: In the circumstances stated...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
New govt advts SI No Names of the Advocate, Tvlg Enrolment No. Office Attached to 1, Arun Anbumani MS 1355/2003 Madras High Court 2, Sharada Vivek MS 1078 2009 3. N.Palanivel MS 606 2001 4. I.Murugesan MS 608/2014 Madurai Bench of Madras High Court

Uncategorized

 by · Published June 17, 2026

New govt advts SI No Names of the Advocate, Tvlg Enrolment No. Office Attached to 1, Arun Anbumani MS 1355/2003 Madras High Court 2, Sharada Vivek MS 1078 2009 3. N.Palanivel MS 606 2001 4. I.Murugesan MS 608/2014 Madurai Bench of Madras High Court

SI No Names of the Advocate, Tvlg Enrolment No. Office Attached to 1, Arun Anbumani MS 1355/2003 Madras High Court 2, Sharada Vivek MS 1078 2009 3. N.Palanivel MS 606 2001 4. I.Murugesan MS...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published June 16, 2026

9:47 5G 52 2 으잉 mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/clists Farty Cause List HIGH COURT OF MADRAS Wednesday 17th Jun, 2026 Respondent Advocate COURT NO. 01 a The Honourable The CHIEF JUSTICE The Honourable Mr. Justice G.ARUL MURUGAN TO BE HEARD THOUки этого совеDEPUTATICAL WIDE ON VEDREDAT THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE 2016 A7 10 10 3.M.Regular t FOR ADMISSION 17081/3026 8.KRISHNAMURTHY M/8.3, INBADURAI V OTHERS J.PAULA ΤΗΣ ΑΡΣΑΚΕΙ ΑΝD TAMILIELVAN WHE 14990/2016 ΚΡΙΘΗΝΑMURTHY INSADUHAIN INBANATHAN, J.PAULRAJTAMILRELVANI SELVAM MAROJKUMAR THE SPEAKER AND OTHERS 24997/2020 AGRI 2.3. KΕΙΔΗNAMURTHY Η.Κ. FERITAR. va M/5.5.INBADURAIS INBANATHAN, J.PAULRAJ TAMILERLVAN VAM MAROJKUMAR THE SPEAKER AND S INSADO INBANATHAN, J.PAULRAT, TAMILRELVAN K. FERITA PERIYAR ADRI MAD.S.INBADURAIN INBANATΗΛΙ FAULRAJ TAMILEELVAN BOJKUMA INBANATHAN 24999/2026 8.9. KRISHNAMURTHY N.K PERITAR. WHE 25005/3036 THE SPRAKER AND отикка THE SPEAKER AND OTHERS M/S.. INSADURAIN INSANATHAN, J.PAULKAJ TANILUELVAN PERIYA 8.ΚΑΣΗΝΑΜΙΚΤΗΥ 15007/2020 5.5. KEISHNAMURTHY 3.K. FERITAR, M/SINBADURAIN INBANATHAN AURAJ TAMILRELVAN THE SPEAKER AND OTHERS 2010/ 2016..KRISHNAMURTHY N.K THE SPEAKER 13085/2016 8.KRISHNAMURTHY MABBINBADURAIN INBANATHAI PAULRAJ, TAMILSELVAN VI OTHERS

9:47 5G 52 2 으잉 mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/clists Farty Cause List HIGH COURT OF MADRAS Wednesday 17th Jun, 2026 Respondent Advocate COURT NO. 01 a The Honourable The CHIEF JUSTICE The Honourable Mr. Justice G.ARUL MURUGAN...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
[16/06, 20:24] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/qByu3ZLyNWI?si=jdbspQUa0i-NaqXS [16/06, 20:25] sekarreporter1: *Madras High Court dismisses plea for CBI probe into AIADMK MLAs joining Vijay’s TVK* The Court said that sudden political realignment may force costly bye-elections, but cannot justify CBI probe without proof of unlawful quid pro quo. https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/madras-high-court-dismisses-plea-for-cbi-probe-into-aiadmk-mlas-joining-vijays-tvk https://www.sekarreporter.com/madras-high-court-dismisses-plea-for-cbi-probe-into-aiadmk-mlas-joining-vijays-tvk-the-court-said-that-sudden-political-realignment-may-force-costly-bye-elections-but-cannot-justify-cbi/

Uncategorized

 by · Published June 16, 2026

[16/06, 20:24] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/qByu3ZLyNWI?si=jdbspQUa0i-NaqXS [16/06, 20:25] sekarreporter1: *Madras High Court dismisses plea for CBI probe into AIADMK MLAs joining Vijay’s TVK* The Court said that sudden political realignment may force costly bye-elections, but cannot justify CBI probe without proof of unlawful quid pro quo. https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/madras-high-court-dismisses-plea-for-cbi-probe-into-aiadmk-mlas-joining-vijays-tvk https://www.sekarreporter.com/madras-high-court-dismisses-plea-for-cbi-probe-into-aiadmk-mlas-joining-vijays-tvk-the-court-said-that-sudden-political-realignment-may-force-costly-bye-elections-but-cannot-justify-cbi/

[16/06, 20:24] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/qByu3ZLyNWI?si=jdbspQUa0i-NaqXS [16/06, 20:25] sekarreporter1: *Madras High Court dismisses plea for CBI probe into AIADMK MLAs joining Vijay’s TVK* The Court said that sudden political realignment may force costly bye-elections, but cannot...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Judge sounder *Madras High Court refuses to quash ED proceedings against Flipkart co-founders in FEMA case* The Court dismissed review petitions filed against its January 2025 judgment, which had declined to interfere with the ED complaint and show-cause notices. https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/madras-high-court-refuses-to-quash-ed-proceedings-against-flipkart-co-founders-in-fema-case

Uncategorized

 by · Published June 16, 2026

Judge sounder *Madras High Court refuses to quash ED proceedings against Flipkart co-founders in FEMA case* The Court dismissed review petitions filed against its January 2025 judgment, which had declined to interfere with the ED complaint and show-cause notices. https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/madras-high-court-refuses-to-quash-ed-proceedings-against-flipkart-co-founders-in-fema-case

*Madras High Court refuses to quash ED proceedings against Flipkart co-founders in FEMA case* The Court dismissed review petitions filed against its January 2025 judgment, which had declined to interfere with the ED complaint...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
*Madras High Court dismisses plea for CBI probe into AIADMK MLAs joining Vijay’s TVK* The Court said that sudden political realignment may force costly bye-elections, but cannot justify CBI probe without proof of unlawful quid pro quo. https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/madras-high-court-dismisses-plea-for-cbi-probe-into-aiadmk-mlas-joining-vijays-tvk

Uncategorized

 by · Published June 16, 2026

*Madras High Court dismisses plea for CBI probe into AIADMK MLAs joining Vijay’s TVK* The Court said that sudden political realignment may force costly bye-elections, but cannot justify CBI probe without proof of unlawful quid pro quo. https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/madras-high-court-dismisses-plea-for-cbi-probe-into-aiadmk-mlas-joining-vijays-tvk

*Madras High Court dismisses plea for CBI probe into AIADMK MLAs joining Vijay’s TVK* The Court said that sudden political realignment may force costly bye-elections, but cannot justify CBI probe without proof of unlawful...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version