Author: Sekar Reporter

March 11, 2026

by Sekar Reporter · Published March 11, 2026

Judge victoriya Gowri /The protestors are directed to cooperate with the Peace Committee in the larger interest of maintaining public order while ensuring that their grievances are appropriately ventilated. 25. Post the matter on 12.03.2026 for reporting compliance and further monitoring.

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 11.03.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI WP CRL.(MD). No.1392 of 2026 A.Rajeshkannan, … Petitioner Vs 1. The Home Secretary, Office of the...

Uncategorized

March 11, 2026

by Sekar Reporter · Published March 11, 2026

The appellant has not established any acceptable ground to interfere with the order of punishment of removal from service. Thus, W.A.No.1485 of 2021 as well as W.P.No.21131 of 2017 are dismissed. No costs. (S.M.S.,J.) (K.S.,J.) 04-03-2026 Index: Yes/No

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04-03-2026 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER WA No. 1485 of 2021 and WP No. 21131 of...

Uncategorized

March 11, 2026

by Sekar Reporter · Published March 11, 2026

19. In view of the above discussions made in the aforementioned paragraphs, the writ order impugned dated 01.08.2022 in W.P.No.11617 of 2016 is set aside and the Writ Appeal stands allowed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition stands closed. (S.M.S., J.) (K.S., J.)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04.03.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDER W.A.No.1016 of 2023 and C.M.P.No.10190 of 2023 1.Gurumurthi 2.Sangeetha @ Anbe Sangeetha …Appellants Vs....

Uncategorized

March 11, 2026

by Sekar Reporter · Published March 11, 2026

In view of the above discussions made in the aforementioned paragraphs, the writ order impugned dated 01.08.2022 in W.P.No.11617 of 2016 is set aside and the Writ Appeal stands allowed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition stands closed. (S.M.S., J.) (K.S., J.)

Uncategorized

March 11, 2026

by Sekar Reporter · Published March 11, 2026

8.In view thereof, the Writ Petition is allowed and the impugned order passed by the first respondent, dated 11.8.2017 is set aside. However, it will be open for the third respondent to approach the Civil Court for appropriate relief, if she is aggrieved by any of the false documents or mutation of revenue records. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :04.03.2026 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P(MD)No.16667 of 2017 and W.M.P(MD)No.13283 of 2017 C.Gomathy … Petitioner .Vs. 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Padmanabhapuram, Thuckalay...

Uncategorized

March 11, 2026

by Sekar Reporter · Published March 11, 2026

Judge Baratha chakraverthy / battle of docters case (vi) The alternative prayer to release their certificates cannot be acceded to in view of the dictum laid down by the Division Bench in P.S.Sairam ’s case (cited supra). (vii) No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Orders reserved on : 25.02.2026 Orders pronounced on : 11.03.2026 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.Nos.5520, 2025, 2831 and 2924 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.2142,...

Uncategorized

March 11, 2026

by Sekar Reporter · Published March 11, 2026

Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Justice G Arul Murugan when a petition filed by R Viswanathan alias MGR Viswanathan came up for hearing. The petitioner had sought directions to bar political parties from forging pre-poll alliances. When the petitioner began arguing his”

[11/03, 20:01] sekarreporter1: “Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Justice G Arul Murugan when a petition filed by R Viswanathan alias MGR Viswanathan came up for hearing. The petitioner had sought directions to bar...

Author: Sekar Reporter

Judge victoriya Gowri /The protestors are directed to cooperate with the Peace Committee in the larger interest of maintaining public order while ensuring that their grievances are appropriately ventilated. 25. Post the matter on 12.03.2026 for reporting compliance and further monitoring.

The appellant has not established any acceptable ground to interfere with the order of punishment of removal from service. Thus, W.A.No.1485 of 2021 as well as W.P.No.21131 of 2017 are dismissed. No costs. (S.M.S.,J.) (K.S.,J.) 04-03-2026 Index: Yes/No

19. In view of the above discussions made in the aforementioned paragraphs, the writ order impugned dated 01.08.2022 in W.P.No.11617 of 2016 is set aside and the Writ Appeal stands allowed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition stands closed. (S.M.S., J.) (K.S., J.)

In view of the above discussions made in the aforementioned paragraphs, the writ order impugned dated 01.08.2022 in W.P.No.11617 of 2016 is set aside and the Writ Appeal stands allowed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition stands closed. (S.M.S., J.) (K.S., J.)

Judge Baratha chakraverthy / battle of docters case (vi) The alternative prayer to release their certificates cannot be acceded to in view of the dictum laid down by the Division Bench in P.S.Sairam ’s case (cited supra). (vii) No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Justice G Arul Murugan when a petition filed by R Viswanathan alias MGR Viswanathan came up for hearing. The petitioner had sought directions to bar political parties from forging pre-poll alliances. When the petitioner began arguing his”

Recent Posts

Recent Posts