SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Author: Sekar Reporter

Another Governor, another party, same questions about gubernatorial discretion Does the Governor enjoy some discretion in cases where the single largest party claims a stake without prima facie satisfying the Governor that it could win the confidence of the House, asks advocate Richardson Wilson.//Richardson Wilson is an advocate practising in the Supreme Court and the Madras High Court. He has appeared for the DMK party in several cases, including the TN Governor case.

Uncategorized

 by · Published May 8, 2026

Another Governor, another party, same questions about gubernatorial discretion Does the Governor enjoy some discretion in cases where the single largest party claims a stake without prima facie satisfying the Governor that it could win the confidence of the House, asks advocate Richardson Wilson.//Richardson Wilson is an advocate practising in the Supreme Court and the Madras High Court. He has appeared for the DMK party in several cases, including the TN Governor case.

[08/05, 11:49] sekarreporter1: https://www.thenewsminute.com/tamil-nadu/another-governor-another-party-same-questions-about-gubernatorial-discretion [08/05, 11:51] sekarreporter1: ” SOUTH CENTRAL SUBSCRIBER ONLY PODCAST VIDEO LONG FORM FLIX SUBSCRIBE Tamil Nadu Another Governor, another party, same questions about gubernatorial discretion Does the Governor enjoy some...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published May 8, 2026

Kasi Ramalingam: Governor can exercise his Constitutional discretionary authority in accordance with the Mandate of our Constitution,when there is no bias in exercising his discretion ,consequently he can not be questioned…..

h [08/05, 09:14] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/Ugkx3TKvl-cpZ87FhKGOKvzZsjZHYX3cx8BV?si=–VC7vVd2XheOtwR [08/05, 09:14] sekarreporter1: [08/05, 08:29] Kasi Ramalingam: Governor can exercise his Constitutional discretionary authority in accordance with the Mandate of our Constitution,when there is no bias in exercising his...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
அதிகாரம் வந்து விட்டால், குதிரை பேரம் போன் றவை நடக்க வாய்ப்புள்ளது. இதை கருத்தில் வைத்து, கவர்னர் பெரும்பான்மையை உறுதி செய்து கொள்வதை, நியாயமான ஒன்றாக பார்க்கலாம். -கே.சக்திவேல், வழக்கறிஞர் சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம்

Uncategorized

 by · Published May 8, 2026

அதிகாரம் வந்து விட்டால், குதிரை பேரம் போன் றவை நடக்க வாய்ப்புள்ளது. இதை கருத்தில் வைத்து, கவர்னர் பெரும்பான்மையை உறுதி செய்து கொள்வதை, நியாயமான ஒன்றாக பார்க்கலாம். -கே.சக்திவேல், வழக்கறிஞர் சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம்

புதிய அரசு அமைய காலக்கெடு இல்லை கவர்னர் ஆதாரம் கேட்பதில் தவறில்லை ஆட்சி அமைக்க தேவையான 118 எம்.எல்.ஏ.,க்கள் ஆதரவு த.வெ.க.,வுக்கு இல்லாததால், கவர்னர் ஆட்சி அமைக்க அழைக் கவில்லை. ஆட்சி அமைக்க கோரும் கட்சி, பெரும்பான் மையை நிரூபிக்க முடியுமா என கவர்னர் உறுதி செய்து...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published May 8, 2026

Justice Victoria Gowri today. When the court was informed that an anticipatory bail plea in connection with the same case was dismissed by the regular court, the court initially decided to post

[08/05, 07:16] sekarreporter1: https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-jana-nayagan-leak-accused-seek-bail-533317 [08/05, 07:16] sekarreporter1: Six persons accused in connection with the online leak of the upcoming Tamil movie “Jana Nayagan” have approached the Madras High Court seeking bail. It may be...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published May 7, 2026

sekarreporter1: S.R. Bommai vs Union Of India on 11 March, 1994 https://share.google/CWaFwUCJRbEcek5si [07/05, 21:56] Meta AI: *S.R. Bommai vs Union of India | 1994 (3) SCC 1* *Date*: 11 March 1994 | *9-Judge Constitution Bench* *Lead Judgment*: Justice P.B. Sawant for majority, with 5 concurring opinions

[07/05, 21:56] sekarreporter1: S.R. Bommai vs Union Of India on 11 March, 1994 https://share.google/CWaFwUCJRbEcek5si [07/05, 21:56] Meta AI: *S.R. Bommai vs Union of India | 1994 (3) SCC 1* *Date*: 11 March 1994 |...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Justice N. Paul Vasantha Kumar, Former Chief Justice High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Senior Advocate./ Not inviting the single largest party to form the Government in the State of Tamil Nadu is undemocratic when no other party is claiming to form the Government. https://www.sekarreporter.com/justice-n-paul-vasantha-kumar-former-chief-justice-high-court-of-jammu-and-kashmir-and-senior-advocate-not-inviting-the-single-largest-party-to-form-the-government-in-the-state-of-tamil-nadu-is-u/

Uncategorized

 by · Published May 7, 2026

Justice N. Paul Vasantha Kumar, Former Chief Justice High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Senior Advocate./ Not inviting the single largest party to form the Government in the State of Tamil Nadu is undemocratic when no other party is claiming to form the Government. https://www.sekarreporter.com/justice-n-paul-vasantha-kumar-former-chief-justice-high-court-of-jammu-and-kashmir-and-senior-advocate-not-inviting-the-single-largest-party-to-form-the-government-in-the-state-of-tamil-nadu-is-u/

Justice N. Paul Vasantha Kumar, Former Chief Justice High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Senior Advocate./ Not inviting the single largest party to form the Government in the State of Tamil Nadu is...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version