You may also like...
-
[2/23, 14:48] Vinothpandian: 2016(5) CTC 746 : Ayyasamy A vs A paramasivam : ” fraud is knowing misrepresentation of truth or concealment of material fact to induce another to act to his detriment [2/23, 14:48] Vinothpandian: 2014(4) CTC 315 : Rajagopalan vs Gnanapandithan : Held non _ issuance of reply or counter affidavit by itself is not ground for allowing applications [2/23, 14:48] Vinothpandian: 2016(4) CTC 92 : Axis bank vs SBS organics Pvt Ltd : SARFASi act 2002 sec 18 : Held pre – deposit made by borrower with tribunal would not empower bank to claim general lien ,banker cannot exercise right of general lien against pre – deposit amount deposited by borrower [2/23, 14:48] Vinothpandian: 2013(1)CTC 931 SC : deputy inspector general of police vs S.Samuthiram : service law : mere acquittal of employee by criminal court has no impact on disciplinary proceedings initiated by employer ,punishment of dismissal of service cannot be interfered [2/23, 14:48] Vinothpandian: AIR 2017 SC 1432 : Sasi vs Aravindakshan Nair : An application for review has to be disposed of as expeditiously as possible [2/23, 14:48] Vinothpandian: AIR 1982 MP 8 : jairam vs jagatram : ignorance of law if pleaded is no ground for condonation of delay
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 23, 2023
-
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Cont P No.1330 of 2021 in CrL.R.C.No.112 of 2021 S.Vasanthi- Petitioner/Petitioner For Petitioner: Mr.R.Singaravelan, Senior Advocate for Mr.V.L. Akshai Sajin Kumar For Respondent: Mr.S.Sugendran, Government Advocate(Crl.side) 8. Though this Court finds that the capacity of the investigating officer is not upto the mark and within her capacity she has investigated the case, the incapacity of the investigation officer cannot be treated as wilfully disobey the order of
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 10, 2022
-