Three trade unions from Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (BHEL) have jointly filed a public interest litigation petition in the Madras High Court insisting upon a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe into the Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation (Tangedco) having awarded a contract for setting up a 660-MW thermal power plant at Ennore at an outlay of ₹4,442.75 crore to BGR Energy Systems Ltd., a private entity.
Follow:
- Next story [2/17, 10:39] .M.Subramaniam, Senior Advocate, father of Arvind Subramaniam Senior Advocate passed away. 098400 37677/ +91 90929 12229. Heartfelt condolences. [2/17, 10:39] sekarreporter1: .
- Previous story justices G Jayachandran and KK Ramakrishnan made the decision after speaking to Kruthika who, based on the court’s directions, was once again produced before the court by the police on Thursday. The judges pointed out that Kruthika is a major
Recent Posts
- appellant is granted liberty to establish his claims for professional fees and agitate his grievances before a competent civil court or appropriate forum. If the appellant chooses to file a civil suit, the time spent bona fide prosecuting the writ petition and this writ appeal shall be excluded for the purpose of computing limitation. There shall be no order as to costs. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J)
- The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court on Tuesday (July 21) directed the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (TNEB) authorities to restore the electricity connection to a petitioner’s shop immediately and granted an interim injunction restraining the authorities from evicting him without following due process of law.
- Trustee moves Madras high court seeking scheme for Vels Trust
- Majestrate power /HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI CRL.RC.(MD)No.577 of 2026 Kannan Baba …. Petitioner Vs. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by the Inspector of Police,
- Lawyer cannot recover disputed legal fees from client by filing writ petition: Madras High Court | https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/lawyer-cannot-recover-disputed-legal-fees-from-client-by-filing-writ-petition-madras-high-court
More
Recent Posts
- appellant is granted liberty to establish his claims for professional fees and agitate his grievances before a competent civil court or appropriate forum. If the appellant chooses to file a civil suit, the time spent bona fide prosecuting the writ petition and this writ appeal shall be excluded for the purpose of computing limitation. There shall be no order as to costs. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J)
- The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court on Tuesday (July 21) directed the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (TNEB) authorities to restore the electricity connection to a petitioner’s shop immediately and granted an interim injunction restraining the authorities from evicting him without following due process of law.
- Trustee moves Madras high court seeking scheme for Vels Trust
- Majestrate power /HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI CRL.RC.(MD)No.577 of 2026 Kannan Baba …. Petitioner Vs. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by the Inspector of Police,
- Lawyer cannot recover disputed legal fees from client by filing writ petition: Madras High Court | https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/lawyer-cannot-recover-disputed-legal-fees-from-client-by-filing-writ-petition-madras-high-court