[6/11, 09:54] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1270934817841074176?s=08 [6/11, 09:54] Sekarreporter 1: Wish u happy birth day co chairman bar council Saravanan https://t.co/1qV3Y9GEjD [6/11, 09:54] Sekarreporter 1: 🙏🏾🍁🍁🌹

by Sekar Reporter · June 11, 2020

[6/11, 09:54] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1270934817841074176?s=08
[6/11, 09:54] Sekarreporter 1: Wish u happy birth day co chairman bar council Saravanan https://t.co/1qV3Y9GEjD
[6/11, 09:54] Sekarreporter 1: 🙏🏾🍁🍁🌹

Share this post:

Share on X (Twitter) Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Email

You may also like...

• 

  Land mark order /Kanchipuram temple orderTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR W.A.Nos.1381 and 1382 of 2022, W. P.No.13027 of 2021, W.P.No.12955 of 2022 and W.P.No.24729 of 2018 and Cont.P.No.367 of 2020 and

  December 1, 2025

   by Sekar Reporter · Published December 1, 2025

• 

  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM   W.P.No.27431 of 2017 and W.M.P.No.29320 of 2017   D.Elangovan           For Petitioner     : Mr.M.Gnanasekar                                           for Mr.S.Ashok kumar                                         For Respondents : Mrs.S.Mythreye Chandru                                          Special Government Pleader          ORDER       13.Thus, this Court is of an opinion that the writ petitioner was denied an opportunity without any valid or acceptable reason and he is eligible and entitled for selection or appointment, since other candidates who scored lesser marks than that of the petitioner were selected and appointed. For all these reasons, the writ petition is to be considered.     

  October 10, 2022

   by Sekar Reporter · Published October 10, 2022

• 

  http://youtube.com/post/UgkxsJ9hbnfVnenhXyQ0cW9Fi_MQRqrF7byV?si=R9pQ8GveCZev9pnf [30/04, 16:11] sekarreporter1: *Jananayagan Piracy Case – Anticipatory Bail Rejected* *Judge*: Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan, Madras HC *Date*: 30 April 2026 — *1. Case* *Offence*: _Jananayagan_ film leaked online before official release *Complainant*: KVN Productions *Accused*: Uma Shankar (A-3) filed anticipatory bail *2. Arguments* *Petitioner*: Claims no connection to leak *State – APP K.M.D. Mugilan*: A-3 is close friend of A-1 & A-2, worked in same company. _Uploaded film online & shared via mobile_. Custodial interrogation needed to trace others. *3. HC Order* *Verdict*: _Bail dismissed_. *Reason*: Serious offence affecting livelihood of 1000s in film industry. Custodial interrogation necessary. Courts must be strict to deter pre-release piracy. *Judge noted*: Piracy wastes years of hard work by technicians & artists in seconds. Harsh action needed to protect cinema industry. *Next*: A-3 to face custodial interrogation by Cyber Crime Police. *KVN Productions counsel*: Advocate Vijayan Subramanian

  April 30, 2026

   by Sekar Reporter · Published April 30, 2026