You may also like...
-
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY In view of the above answers, I am in agreement with the findings of the Trial Court in respect of all the five issues framed and this Appeal Suit is without any merit. Appeal Suit No. 1267 of 2003 1. Hari Ohm Estates repd. by Partner, C Subramaniam. For Appellants : M/s J.R.K. Bhavanantham For Respondents : M/s V. Gangatharan (for R1 & R4) : M/s. P.B. Ramanjujam (for R3) : M/s. P. Veena Suresh (for R10) : R6 – DIED. : Notice served (R2, 5, 7, 8, 9) JUDGMENT
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 8, 2023
-
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ; Order 23 Rule 3 and Order 43 Rule 1A – An aggrieved person against the compromise decree has a right to file an application before the Court which granted the decree – He has the right to avail either the remedy of appeal in terms of Order 43 Rule 1A CPC or by way of an application before the court granting decree [Referred to Banwari Lal V. Chando Devi (Smt.) (Through LRS.) & Anr.’ (1993) 1 SCC 581] HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 3, 2022
-