[23/11, 07:27] Sekarreporter: “Justice N. Anand Venkatesh observed that the medical records produced showed that the petitioner underwent surgery on July 12, 2024, and was discharged on July 17, 2024. Since the surgery occurred months after the limitation period expired and the petitioner had been actively contesting the matter before the CESTAT thereafter, the Court held that the medical reason could not justify the delay.” https://www.taxscan.in/top-stories/madras-hc-rejects-6-month-delay-revision-plea-notes-applicant-had-ample-time-to-contest-gold-silver-seizure-after-surgery-1438061#:~:text=Justice%20N.%20Anand,justify%20the%20delay. [23/11, 07:27] Sekarreporter: 👍

[23/11, 07:27] Sekarreporter: “Justice N. Anand Venkatesh observed that the medical records produced showed that the petitioner underwent surgery on July 12, 2024, and was discharged on July 17, 2024. Since the surgery occurred months after the limitation period expired and the petitioner had been actively contesting the matter before the CESTAT thereafter, the Court held that the medical reason could not justify the delay.”
https://www.taxscan.in/top-stories/madras-hc-rejects-6-month-delay-revision-plea-notes-applicant-had-ample-time-to-contest-gold-silver-seizure-after-surgery-1438061#:~:text=Justice%20N.%20Anand,justify%20the%20delay.
[23/11, 07:27] Sekarreporter: 👍

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

You may also like...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version