SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Daily Archive: February 23, 2026

Uncategorized

 by · Published February 23, 2026

HONBLE Justice AD Jagadish Chandra was pleased to allow the Crl Revision by discharging Dr. Thol.Thirumavalavan from the charges on the ground that the final report filed belatedly; previous sanction to prosecute a MP was not obtained by the State. M/s. D. PARVENTHAN and S. Deepika, Advocates appeared for the Petitioner.

[23/02, 17:41] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/Ugkx9KTnj29dmlbD1mHzF0d3wJYOE00oA2o1?si=pYu-7Em8cgLvaY4R [23/02, 17:41] sekarreporter1: Dr. Thol. Thirumavalavan had made a speech in a public meeting at Puducherry on 08.01.2014; condemning few miscreants who have damaged Dr. Ambedkar Statue at Puducherry, PMK...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
sekarreporter1: https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/can-fir-be-quashed-partially-based-on-compromise-with-some-accused-supreme-court-appoints-amicus-to-consider-524205 [23/02, 17:37] sekarreporter1: The Supreme Court recently appointed Senior Advocate K Parameshwar as an Amicus Curiae to deliberate on the issue of whether a criminal case can be quashed as against one of the many accused under Section 482

Uncategorized

 by · Published February 23, 2026

sekarreporter1: https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/can-fir-be-quashed-partially-based-on-compromise-with-some-accused-supreme-court-appoints-amicus-to-consider-524205 [23/02, 17:37] sekarreporter1: The Supreme Court recently appointed Senior Advocate K Parameshwar as an Amicus Curiae to deliberate on the issue of whether a criminal case can be quashed as against one of the many accused under Section 482

[23/02, 17:37] sekarreporter1: https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/can-fir-be-quashed-partially-based-on-compromise-with-some-accused-supreme-court-appoints-amicus-to-consider-524205 [23/02, 17:37] sekarreporter1: The Supreme Court recently appointed Senior Advocate K Parameshwar as an Amicus Curiae to deliberate on the issue of whether a criminal case can be quashed as...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published February 23, 2026

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.P(MD)No.4670 of 2026 and W.M.P(MD) No.3904 of 2026 P.Supaitha …Petitioner Counsel for petitioner: G Vignesh The GO issued for one time regularisation scheme for quarrying activities in tamilnadu has been granted with status quo. Order by Hon’ble Justice Krishnan Ramasamy, Madurai bench of madras high court

[23/02, 16:14] Ngt Vignesh Ganesan: Counsel for petitioner: G Vignesh The GO issued for one time regularisation scheme for quarrying activities in tamilnadu has been granted with status quo. Order by Hon’ble Justice Krishnan...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published February 23, 2026

Mr.Justice N.ANAND VENKATESH Arbitration O.P.(Com.Div.) No.708 of 2025 MIOT Hospitals Private Limited rep.by its Authorized Signatory Mr.B.S.Vidhyasagar No.4/112, Mount Poonamallee Road, Manapakkam, Chennai-89. …Petitioner Vs Dr.Balaraman Palaniappan,

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Reserved on 18.2.2026 Delivered on: 23.2.2026 Coram : The Honourable Mr.Justice N.ANAND VENKATESH Arbitration O.P.(Com.Div.) No.708 of 2025 MIOT Hospitals Private Limited rep.by its Authorized Signatory...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published February 23, 2026

The Supreme Court has ruled that landowners are not liable for construction delays caused by developers, as long as they are not involved in the construction process and have been indemnified by the developer. This decision was made in the case of Sriganesh Chandrasekaran & Others

[23/02, 13:55] sekarreporter1: Landowners Not Liable For Construction Delay By Developer : Supreme Court |@mittal_mtn #SupremeCourt [23/02, 13:55] Meta AI: The Supreme Court has ruled that landowners are not liable for construction delays caused...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
The Court noted that the committee was examining administrative lapses and was not overlapping with the criminal investigation.

Uncategorized

 by · Published February 23, 2026

The Court noted that the committee was examining administrative lapses and was not overlapping with the criminal investigation.

[23/02, 13:30] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2025841856509280564 [23/02, 13:30] sekarreporter1: The Court noted that the committee was examining administrative lapses and was not overlapping with the criminal investigation. Read more: bitl.to/5h7v #TirpuatiLaddu #SupremeCourt [23/02, 13:30] Meta AI:...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version