Daily Archive: February 6, 2026

Senior Advocate Rachna Srivastava, for the petitioner, submitted before a bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi that the collegium composition was wrong, as Justice Banu was then a judge of the High Court. “The composition of the collegium itself was…she continued to be a judge, she had not joined the transferee High Court,” she submitted. “We can only assure you that the Chief Justice of India and the collegium judges are strong enough to take anything…thank you for advising us on that..” CJI Kant said.

The Supreme Court on Friday refused to entertain a writ petition challenging the recommendations stated to have been made by the Madras High Court in November 2025,  observing that the issue was not justiciable....

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

BIG! Supreme Court REFUSED to entertain a plea filed by Prashant Kishor seeking RE-ELECTION in Bihar, citing FREEBIES. CJI Surya Kant: “Once people REJECT you, you use the judicial forum to get RELIEF…?”

BIG! Supreme Court REFUSED to entertain a plea filed by Prashant Kishor seeking RE-ELECTION in Bihar, citing FREEBIES. CJI Surya Kant: “Once people REJECT you, you use the judicial forum to get RELIEF…?”

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

#InTheCourtroom CJI was hearing a writ petition of a lady relating to pending claims Counsel: she’s a poor woman mylords CJI: she was poor before coming to SC or became poor after coming to SC ?: CJI: pls donot say she is a ‘poor’ woman, you say that she is a fighter woman who is not going to sit at home unless the entire claim is taken to a logical conclusion – why are you branding her as poor woman when she is before SC

[06/02, 12:31] Sekarreporter: #InTheCourtroom CJI was hearing a writ petition of a lady relating to pending claims Counsel: she’s a poor woman mylords CJI: she was poor before coming to SC or became poor...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

The Madras High Court’s Full Bench has ruled that there’s a clear difference between ‘resignation’ and ‘voluntary retirement’, following a Supreme Court judgment. Resignation can’t be treated as voluntary retirement, and a previous judgment (D.Vijayarangan Vs. Secretary Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal and Others) is now considered incorrect. Instead, the views in A.I.Angel Illangovan Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu are upheld. 😊

[06/02, 12:22] Meta AI: The Madras High Court has emphasized the distinction between resignation and voluntary retirement, citing a Supreme Court judgment. The key difference lies in the implications of each action: resignation typically...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Mhc Full bench/ There is a valid distinction between ‘resignation’ and ‘voluntary retirement’ as held by the Three Judge Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court inSenior Divisional Manager LIC and Ors vs Shree Lal Meena[10]. Therefore, resignation from service cannot be treated as voluntary retirement. The principle settled in D.Vijayarangan Vs. Secretary Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal and Others (supra) is held to be bad in law. Therefore, the views of the division Bench of this Court in A.I.Angel Illangovan Vs.   The Government of Tamil Nadu (supra), is hereby upheld.

  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-02-2026 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY THE HON’BLE  MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN WP No. 39583 of 2015 AND...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

BIG BREAKING 🚨 Supreme Court will hear a PIL in March 2026 on “irrational freebies” promised by political parties during elections to win power. CJI SURYAKANT : “This is an issue of paramount importance and serious public interest” 🔥 Petitioner Ashwini Upadhyay : “Only the sun and moon are left to be promised”

BIG BREAKING 🚨 Supreme Court will hear a PIL in March 2026 on “irrational freebies” promised by political parties during elections to win power. CJI SURYAKANT : “This is an issue of paramount importance...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version