Daily Archive: September 10, 2025

learned Single Judge had examined the issues in entirety and had correctly noted that there is no other option once Form – P is issued but, to refund the tax paid in excess by the writ petitioner for the said assessment year 2008 – 2009. We find no reason to interfere with the order of the learned Single Judge and accordingly, the writ appeal stands dismissed. Consequently, there shall be a direction to the appellants that the refund should be effected within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment together with applicable interest. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [C.V.K., J.] [R.V., J.] 03.09.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No PKN To: 1. The Assistant Commissioner(CT), Karur (West) Circle, Karur – 639 207. 2. The Deputy Commissioner (CT), Karur, Karur – 639 207.   C.V.KARTHIKEYAN , J. and R.VIJAYAKUMAR , J. PKN W.A.(MD) No.913 of 2020 03.09.2025

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.09.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR W.A.(MD) No.913 of 2020 and C.M.P(MD) No.4988 of 2020 1. The Assistant Commissioner(CT),...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
NOTIFICATION NO. 247 / 2025 I. HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR   and   HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA  will sit in a Division Bench at 2.15 P.M. on 10.09.2025 and take up the cases as listed through Video  conferencing / Hybrid / Physical

NOTIFICATION NO. 247 / 2025 I. HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR and HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA will sit in a Division Bench at 2.15 P.M. on 10.09.2025 and take up the cases as listed through Video conferencing / Hybrid / Physical

[10/09, 08:25] Sekarreporter: NOTIFICATION NO. 247 / 2025 I. HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR and HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA will sit in a Division Bench at 2.15 P.M. on 10.09.2025 and take up the cases...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Justice N. Senthilkumar orders notice, returnable by September 26, to her and permits the counsel for the catering company to serve private notice too/disparaging the “goodwill and reputation” of the unregistered trademark ‘Madhampatty Pakashala.’

Hindu imran news Catering company ‘Madhampatty Pakashala’ moves Madras High Court against defamatory posts by costume designer Joy Crizildaa Justice N. Senthilkumar orders notice, returnable by September 26, to her and permits the counsel...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Sc This Court was concerned with an issue where an order was pronounced but even after more than three months, reasons were not forthcoming, and the Judgment was not available to either of the parties.

REPORTABLE 2025 INSC 1081 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 3904/2025 (@SLP(CRL.)NO.13881/2025 (DIARY NO.43582/2018 RAJAN Appellant(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA Respondent(s) O R D E R 1....

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version