Daily Archive: October 24, 2022

In view of the above and for the reasons stated above, the present appeals succeed. The impugned judgment(s) and order(s) passed by the Division Bench of the High Court as well as that of the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition and refusing to issue the writ of quo warranto declaring the appointment of respondent No. 1 as Vice Chancellor of the APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University, Thiruvananthapuram as bad in law and/or illegal and void ab initio are hereby quashed and set aside. The writ petition is allowed. There shall be a writ of quo warranto declaring the appointment of the respondent No. 1 as Vice Chancellor of the APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University, Thiruvananthapuram as void ab initio and consequently, the appointment of respondent No. 1 as Vice Chancellor of the  APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University, Thiruvananthapuram is quashed and set aside.   Present appeals are accordingly allowed. No costs. 

In view of the above and for the reasons stated above, the present appeals succeed. The impugned judgment(s) and order(s) passed by the Division Bench of the High Court as well as that of the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition and refusing to issue the writ of quo warranto declaring the appointment of respondent No. 1 as Vice Chancellor of the APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University, Thiruvananthapuram as bad in law and/or illegal and void ab initio are hereby quashed and set aside. The writ petition is allowed. There shall be a writ of quo warranto declaring the appointment of the respondent No. 1 as Vice Chancellor of the APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University, Thiruvananthapuram as void ab initio and consequently, the appointment of respondent No. 1 as Vice Chancellor of the APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University, Thiruvananthapuram is quashed and set aside.  Present appeals are accordingly allowed. No costs. 

2   In view of the above and for the reasons stated above, the present appeals succeed. The impugned judgment(s) and order(s) passed by the Division Bench of the High Court as well as...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Constitutional Czars  in the Hall of Fame     Constitutional Czars  in the Hall of Fame  (Musings, Anecdotes & Episodes)        N Vijayaraghavan  V Lakshminarayanan Advocates, Madras High Court     Special Contributions:  Justice P N Prakash  Justice  G R Swaminathan  Justice N Anand Venkatesh

Constitutional Czars in the Hall of Fame Constitutional Czars in the Hall of Fame (Musings, Anecdotes & Episodes) N Vijayaraghavan V Lakshminarayanan Advocates, Madras High Court Special Contributions: Justice P N Prakash Justice  G R Swaminathan Justice N Anand Venkatesh

  Constitutional Czars in the Hall of Fame   Constitutional Czars in the Hall of Fame (Musings, Anecdotes & Episodes)     N Vijayaraghavan V Lakshminarayanan Advocates, Madras High Court   Special Contributions: Justice...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version