Monthly Archive: June 2021

Full order W.P. No. 13214 of 2021  N. KIRUBAKARAN, J.  AND  T.V. THAMILSELVI, J.  (Order of the Court was made by N. KIRUBAKARAN,J.)  Pursuant to the 24 hours notice issued by this Court with regard to the prayer made by the petitioner, Mr. R. Sankara Narayanan, learned Additional Solicitor General appeared before this Court and would submit tht anti-COVID-19 therapeutic application of the drgu 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG) has been developed by Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Allied Science (INMAS), a lab of Defence Research and Development—–Mr.Venkata Sivakumar, intervener, would submit that the medicine 2-Deoxy-D-Glucose (2-DG) has been found to be very efficacious as per the statement of Dr. Gopalakrishnan of Yashomathi Hospitals, Bangalore.   4. Mrs. Geetha, learned counsel, who has also intervened, would confirm the same as she happens to be a close friend of the said Doctor.   5. An affidavit of Dr. Gopalakrishnan, Yashomathi Hospitals, Bangalore, as to how the drug is very effective, could be circulated to us.   6. It is open to the parties to make a mention to bring up the matter, if any necessity arises for further clarifications or for making further arguments or for circulating instructions.   7. Post the matter next week.   (N.K.K.J.) (T.V.T.S.J.) 25.06.2021

Full order W.P. No. 13214 of 2021 N. KIRUBAKARAN, J. AND T.V. THAMILSELVI, J. (Order of the Court was made by N. KIRUBAKARAN,J.) Pursuant to the 24 hours notice issued by this Court with regard to the prayer made by the petitioner, Mr. R. Sankara Narayanan, learned Additional Solicitor General appeared before this Court and would submit tht anti-COVID-19 therapeutic application of the drgu 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG) has been developed by Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Allied Science (INMAS), a lab of Defence Research and Development—–Mr.Venkata Sivakumar, intervener, would submit that the medicine 2-Deoxy-D-Glucose (2-DG) has been found to be very efficacious as per the statement of Dr. Gopalakrishnan of Yashomathi Hospitals, Bangalore. 4. Mrs. Geetha, learned counsel, who has also intervened, would confirm the same as she happens to be a close friend of the said Doctor. 5. An affidavit of Dr. Gopalakrishnan, Yashomathi Hospitals, Bangalore, as to how the drug is very effective, could be circulated to us. 6. It is open to the parties to make a mention to bring up the matter, if any necessity arises for further clarifications or for making further arguments or for circulating instructions. 7. Post the matter next week. (N.K.K.J.) (T.V.T.S.J.) 25.06.2021

W.P. No. 13214 of 2021 N. KIRUBAKARAN, J. AND T.V. THAMILSELVI, J. (Order of the Court was made by N. KIRUBAKARAN,J.) Pursuant to the 24 hours notice issued by this Court with regard to...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Full order W.P. No. 5178 of 2021—-The 3rd respondent shall file all documents to prove his community status before this Court so that this Court could pass appropriate orders. It is made clear that the matter will be decided on the next hearing date itself.   8. Post on 09.07.2021.  (N.K.K.J.) (T.V.T.S.J.) 25.06.2021  N. KIRUBAKARAN,J.  AND  T.V. THAMILSELVI,J.   (Order of the Court was made by N. KIRUBAKARAN,J.)   The matter is heard through videoconferencing.   2. The petitioner contends that the 3rd respondent, who got elected as President of Ayyarnapalli Village Panchayat, Soolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District which is reserved for ST community, does not belong to ST community and he belongs to “Vakkaligar” community, which is a Backward Class community. By falsely declaring his community status as “Kuruchchan” community classified as a Scheduled Tribe in the nomination form dated 14.12.2019, the 3rd respondent got elected as President of Ayyanarpalli Panchayat, which is exclusively reserved for Scheduled Tribe.

Full order W.P. No. 5178 of 2021—-The 3rd respondent shall file all documents to prove his community status before this Court so that this Court could pass appropriate orders. It is made clear that the matter will be decided on the next hearing date itself. 8. Post on 09.07.2021. (N.K.K.J.) (T.V.T.S.J.) 25.06.2021 N. KIRUBAKARAN,J. AND T.V. THAMILSELVI,J. (Order of the Court was made by N. KIRUBAKARAN,J.) The matter is heard through videoconferencing. 2. The petitioner contends that the 3rd respondent, who got elected as President of Ayyarnapalli Village Panchayat, Soolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District which is reserved for ST community, does not belong to ST community and he belongs to “Vakkaligar” community, which is a Backward Class community. By falsely declaring his community status as “Kuruchchan” community classified as a Scheduled Tribe in the nomination form dated 14.12.2019, the 3rd respondent got elected as President of Ayyanarpalli Panchayat, which is exclusively reserved for Scheduled Tribe.

W.P. No. 5178 of 2021 N. KIRUBAKARAN,J. AND T.V. THAMILSELVI,J. (Order of the Court was made by N. KIRUBAKARAN,J.) The matter is heard through videoconferencing. 2. The petitioner contends that the 3rd respondent, who...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
[6/25, 20:36] Sekarreporter: https://youtu.be/37eMphkscWE [6/25, 20:36] Sekarreporter: அன்புள்ள சேகர்,மூத்த வழக்கறிஞர் திரு.சிங்காரவேலன் அவர்கள் ஆகம முறைப்படி அமைந்த கோயில்கள் பற்றிய தகவல்களை சேகரித்து உருவாக்கிய ஆவண அறிக்கை குறித்து தாங்கள் நடத்திய நேர்காணல் நன்றாக இருந்தது.இந்த ஆன்மீக திருப்பணியை செய்தமைக்கு திரு.சிங்காரவேலனுக்கும் தங்களுக்கும மிக்க நன்றி.-அய்யாதுரை.சு [6/25, 20:36] Sekarreporter: 💐💐💐

[6/25, 20:36] Sekarreporter: https://youtu.be/37eMphkscWE [6/25, 20:36] Sekarreporter: அன்புள்ள சேகர்,மூத்த வழக்கறிஞர் திரு.சிங்காரவேலன் அவர்கள் ஆகம முறைப்படி அமைந்த கோயில்கள் பற்றிய தகவல்களை சேகரித்து உருவாக்கிய ஆவண அறிக்கை குறித்து தாங்கள் நடத்திய நேர்காணல் நன்றாக இருந்தது.இந்த ஆன்மீக திருப்பணியை செய்தமைக்கு திரு.சிங்காரவேலனுக்கும் தங்களுக்கும மிக்க நன்றி.-அய்யாதுரை.சு [6/25, 20:36] Sekarreporter: 💐💐💐

[6/25, 20:36] Sekarreporter: https://youtu.be/37eMphkscWE [6/25, 20:36] Sekarreporter: அன்புள்ள சேகர்,மூத்த வழக்கறிஞர் திரு.சிங்காரவேலன் அவர்கள் ஆகம முறைப்படி அமைந்த கோயில்கள் பற்றிய தகவல்களை சேகரித்து உருவாக்கிய ஆவண அறிக்கை குறித்து தாங்கள் நடத்திய நேர்காணல் நன்றாக இருந்தது.இந்த ஆன்மீக திருப்பணியை செய்தமைக்கு திரு.சிங்காரவேலனுக்கும் தங்களுக்கும மிக்க...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
25.06.2021  PRESS RELEASE  The Government of Tamilnadu, Bar Council of Tamilnadu and Puducherry and Neethikarangal, Tamilnadu Senior Advocates Forum have jointly organizing a Vaccination Camp from 28.06.2021 at about 10 a.m., for the Advocates, Advocate Clerks, Court Staff Members and their family in the premises of the Bar Council of Tamilnadu and Puducherry, High Court Campus, Chennai 600 104. http://barcounciloftamilnadupuducherry.org/a/content/vaccination-registration-form                                                 CHAIRMAN, BAR COUNCIL.

25.06.2021 PRESS RELEASE The Government of Tamilnadu, Bar Council of Tamilnadu and Puducherry and Neethikarangal, Tamilnadu Senior Advocates Forum have jointly organizing a Vaccination Camp from 28.06.2021 at about 10 a.m., for the Advocates, Advocate Clerks, Court Staff Members and their family in the premises of the Bar Council of Tamilnadu and Puducherry, High Court Campus, Chennai 600 104. http://barcounciloftamilnadupuducherry.org/a/content/vaccination-registration-form CHAIRMAN, BAR COUNCIL.

25.06.2021 PRESS RELEASE The Government of Tamilnadu, Bar Council of Tamilnadu and Puducherry and Neethikarangal, Tamilnadu Senior Advocates Forum have jointly organizing a Vaccination Camp from 28.06.2021 at about 10 a.m., for the Advocates,...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Full order THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH AND THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA  O.S.A.No.105 of 2020-     .As regards the legality of the interference of the Court to the Award of the Arbitrator is concerned, the Courts have got limited scope to interfere with the reasons and findings given by the Arbitrator on the basis of interpreting the terms of the contract. Even if an another view of interpretation or understanding of the terms of the contract is possible, those views cannot be allowed to substitute the reasoned understanding and construction given by the learned Arbitrator, so long as those views of the Arbitrator are reasonable and based on the materials placed before him. In view of these reasons, the Order of the learned single Judge which upheld the Award of the Arbitrator does not warrant any interference.]  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Full order THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH AND THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA O.S.A.No.105 of 2020- .As regards the legality of the interference of the Court to the Award of the Arbitrator is concerned, the Courts have got limited scope to interfere with the reasons and findings given by the Arbitrator on the basis of interpreting the terms of the contract. Even if an another view of interpretation or understanding of the terms of the contract is possible, those views cannot be allowed to substitute the reasoned understanding and construction given by the learned Arbitrator, so long as those views of the Arbitrator are reasonable and based on the materials placed before him. In view of these reasons, the Order of the learned single Judge which upheld the Award of the Arbitrator does not warrant any interference.] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

As regards the legality of the interference of the Court to the Award of the Arbitrator is concerned, the Courts have got limited scope to interfere with the reasons and findings given by the...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version