You may also like...
-
Justice M.Sundar and Justice Hemanth Chandangoudar, and the counsel for the petitioner submits that under section 28(2)(ii) of Tamilnadu State Highway Act, 2001 its mandatory for the Government to pass an order for the explanation given by the petitioner for issuance of Demolition notice to the petitioner,
by Sekar Reporter · Published August 9, 2025
-
-
Temple land case judge mahadevan order upheld by mhc # TN govt appeal dismissed–transfer of land to the Transport Department was in violation of the provisions of the Act of 1959 and Rule 13 of the Revenue Standing Order No.26, the order of learned Single Judge is not interfered with and the directions given by the learned Single Judge shall be forthwith given effect to. The Commissioner, HR & CE, would however be at liberty to exercise the power under Section 34 of the Act of 1959. With the aforesaid, the writ appeals are disposed of. Consequently, the Miscellaneous petitions in C.M.P.Nos.933, 936, 952, 954, 1514, 1531, 1533, 619, 664, 667, 668 & 670 of 2022 are closed. No costs. (M.N.B., CJ.) (N.M., J.) 13.06.2022
by Sekar Reporter · Published June 22, 2022