You may also like...
-
Madras High Court convicts its court officer for taking bribe from illiterate man on false promise of securing job
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 22, 2023
-
28. In the result, both the impugned orders i.e., orders passed by the Disciplinary Authority, dated 10.03.1999 as well as the Appellate Authority dated 10.08.1999 are hereby quashed. As a sequel, the petitioner shall be entitled to get service benefits which are available to 27/30 W.P. No. 977 of 2007 him under the relevant service rules. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is allowed as indicated above. However, there shall be no order as to cost. 05.01.2021 Index: Yes Speaking Order: Yes vji 28/30. Judge r sureskumar
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 23, 2021
-
Facebook announces members of its ‘supreme court’ for content
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 7, 2020