மதுரவாயல் – வாலாஜாபேட்டை இடையிலான சுங்கச்சாவடிகளில் 50 சதவீத கட்டணம் வசூலிக்க உத்தரவு https://t.co/1jd2Pw8OzO
மதுரவாயல் – வாலாஜாபேட்டை இடையிலான சுங்கச்சாவடிகளில் 50 சதவீத கட்டணம் வசூலிக்க உத்தரவு https://t.co/1jd2Pw8OzO
You may also like...
-
On instructions, learned Additional Advocate General would submit that, with regard to the directions issued by this Court already to the Inspector General of Registration to issue a comprehensive circular for implementation of the orders already passed by this Court in this regard pertaining to Section 23 of the Registration Act is concerned, it is under the active consideration of the Department as well as the Government to make some amendment in the relevant provisions of the Registration Act and it would take some reasonable time. Hence, the learned Additional Advocate General seeks four weeks time. Considering the said submission made by the learned Additional Advocate General and taking into account the pouring in of writ petitions on this issue which has become an everyday affair, in order to curtail the same, an early decision in this regard from the Government or the Department is appreciable. Page 1 of 2 W.P.Nos.33616 of 2022 etc., batch R.SURESH KUMAR, J. KST
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 13, 2023
-
[5/25, 09:12] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1397035353505091590?s=1006 [5/25, 09:13] Sekarreporter1: [5/25, 08:50] Nappinai Advt: WhatsApp row: Time for courts to step in. N. S. Nappinai, Advocate, Supreme Court & Founder- Cyber Saathi writes for The Hindu Business Line on the larger legal implications of the whatsapp privacy policy fracas. https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/whatsapp-case-time-for-courts-to-step-in/article34628279.ece?utm_campaign=amp_article_share&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=whatsapp.com [5/25, 09:11] Sekarreporter1: 💐
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 25, 2021
-
this court has also granted an order. P.Valliappan, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant, would submit that one T.R.Ramesh had earlier filed W.P.No.33103 of 2022 challenging the Circular in of interim stay of the impugned order. When the matter is pending consideration before this court, without taking leave of this court, appointing the third respondent as a Member of the Committee is, prima facie, not only unjustified, but is also an attempt to make the pending W.P.No.33103 of 2022 infructuous. R.Shunmugasundaram, learned Advocate General assisted by Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan, learned Special Government Pleader, and Ms.A.G.Shakeena, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of respondents 1 and 2. Issue notice to the third respondent; returnable in four weeks. Private notice is also permitted. List the matter after four weeks. There shall be an order of interim stay of the impugned order till then. (T.R., A.C.J.) (D.B.C., J.) 15.02.2023 sasi THE HON’BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY,J. (sasi) W.P.No.4531 of 2023 and W.M.P.No.4537 of 2023 15.02.2023
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 21, 2023