பொங்கல் தினத்தை முன்னிட்டு வழக்கறிஞர்களுக்கான கிரிக்கெட் போட்டியை நீதியரசர் திரு கே என் பாஷா அவர்கள் தொடங்கி வைத்தார்.kn bashaj photos attached
![Suo Motu Crl. Contempt Petition No.929 of 2020 P.N.PRAKASH, J. AND V.SIVAGNANAM, J. O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by P.N.PRAKASH, J.] One Ms.R.Poornima (District Judge cadre), is functioning as Registrar (Vigilance) of this Court for the last two and a half years. She has been acting under the direct supervision of the Vigilance Committee of the High Court and under the nose of the Hon’ble Chief Justice. It is common knowledge that in the last two and a half years, the Vigilance Committee has been taking serious action against delinquent judicial officers and staff members, which has earned for Ms.R.Poornima, the wrath of vested interests, who are yearning for her scalp.](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story Setting aside the Thanjavur collector’s order which rejected an arbitration application on the ground that it was filed outside the prescribed period, the Madras high court held that there is no time limit specified for applying before the arbitrator under the National Highways Act, 1956. Justice S S Sundar observed that even otherwise if the Limitation Act, 1963, was applied in the case, the period prescribed under section 137, which is applicable in the present case, the appeal was filed well before time. “From the facts of the case in hand, this court is satisfied that the appeal had been filed within the prescribed time. Hence, this court has no hesitation to hold that the order passed by the collector dismissing the appeal on the ground of limitation is not only illegal on accounts of the judgements of the earlier division bench of this court, but also by accepting the case of the collector regarding application of Limitation Act,” observed the judge.
- Previous story The Madurai Bench of Madras High Courtheld that registered person making zero rated supply shall be eligible to claim IGSTrefunds, irrespective of the circular on clarifications on exports related refund issues (Circular No.37/2018-Customs, dated 09.10.2018). The ruling was made by a single bench consisting of Justice M.Govindaraj, in the case of M/s.Precot Meridian Limited v. The Commissioner of Customs and Anr.
Recent Posts
- sekarreporter1: https://x.com/pwilsondmk/status/1934523542277853236?s=46 [16/06, 14:02] sekarreporter1: The summons issued by ED to Mr. Arvind Datar, Senior Counsel to come for
- Mha Ec Gobu: #வழக்கறிஞர்கள் #சமூகநீதிப்பேரவை #சார்பில் #ஆர்ப்பாட்டம். வழக்கறிஞர்
- Biodata of HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
- Quashed MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Crl.O.P.No.14103 of 2025 — 1.Muruganandam 2.Manimaran .. Petitioners
- Murugan conference MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI W.P.CRL.(MD)Nos.110 and 185 of 2025 and WPMPCRL(MD)Nos.26 and 47 of 2025 in WPCRL(MD)No.110 of 2025 Hindu Munnani Rep.by its State Secretary
More
Recent Posts
- sekarreporter1: https://x.com/pwilsondmk/status/1934523542277853236?s=46 [16/06, 14:02] sekarreporter1: The summons issued by ED to Mr. Arvind Datar, Senior Counsel to come for
- Mha Ec Gobu: #வழக்கறிஞர்கள் #சமூகநீதிப்பேரவை #சார்பில் #ஆர்ப்பாட்டம். வழக்கறிஞர்
- Biodata of HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
- Quashed MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Crl.O.P.No.14103 of 2025 — 1.Muruganandam 2.Manimaran .. Petitioners
- Murugan conference MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI W.P.CRL.(MD)Nos.110 and 185 of 2025 and WPMPCRL(MD)Nos.26 and 47 of 2025 in WPCRL(MD)No.110 of 2025 Hindu Munnani Rep.by its State Secretary
