You may also like...
-
Sekarreporter: Key notes [11/01, 07:56] Meta AI: 📝 Key notes from the judgment: – Madras High Court quashed demands for surface compensation raised under Section 72 of Mineral Concession Rules, 1960. – Demands deemed arbitrary, unilateral, and incorrect in law. – 32 matters disposed of, including 19 Writ Appeals and 13 Writ Petitions. – Judgment delivered by Justice Anita Sumanth and Justice C. Kumarappan. – Attachments, if any, to be raised. – No costs imposed.
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 11, 2026
-
In a significant ruling, the Madras High Court interpreted the word “already undergoing a sentence” under Section 427 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, with an attempt to balance it with the fundamental right to personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 13, 2020
-
https://lawstreet.co/judiciary/high-courts-must-pronounce-judgments-within-three-months-of-reserving-verdicts-bail-orders-must-be-pronounced-within-a-day-sc [31/05, 08:18] Meta AI: *Case #39: _Guidelines on Timely Pronouncement_ | Supreme Court | 24.05.2026* _Bench: CJI + Justices. 2026 INSC 590_. *Judicial Discipline + Art 21 + Bail Timelines*. *HJS Constitutional, Law Officer – Courts, UPSC GS-2*
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 31, 2026