You may also like...
-
-
Full order THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.42735 of 2016 and W.M.P.No.36664 of 2016 Pandian Recreation Club, Rep.by its Secretary. —For Petitioner :Mr.M.Murali For Respondents : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Government Advocate The jurisdictional Police authorities, on registration of criminal cases against any such Clubs, societies, are directed to communicate the copy of the F.I.R to the concerned jurisdictional District Registrar of the said society for initiation of appropriate action under the provisions of the Societies Registration Act.
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 28, 2021
-
Furthermore, the photographs produced in Court would reveal that there is some construction going to install a deity, which appears to be a recent construction only to grab the land of waterbody and thus, the prayer of the fourth respondent to save it or to direct the Tahsildar to open the deity for offering prayers cannot be accepted because the effort is nothing but to somehow encroach the land of waterbody in the name of religion, despite the judgment of the Apex Court not endorsing the construction of a temple or installation of a deity on the Government land and in the instant case, there is nothing on record to show permission to install a deity or construct a temple. With the aforesaid, the writ petitions are disposed of. No costs. Consequently, W.M.P.No.3133 of 2022 is closed. (M.N.B., CJ.) (D.B.C., J.). For the Petitioner in WP.2966/2022 : Mr.S.Venkatesh in WP.7021/2022 : Mr.C.Munusamy For the Respondents in WP.2966/2022 : Mr.P.Muthukumar State Govt. Pleader for RR 1 to 3 : Mr.C.Munusamy for R-4 in WP.7021/2022 : Mr.P.Muthukumar State Govt. Pleader for RR 1 and 2 : Mr.S.Venkatesh for R-3 : No appearance for R-4 * * * * * COMMON ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon’ble Chief Justice)
by Sekar Reporter · Published August 11, 2022