SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Yercad cooperative training institute case full oder judge r sureskumar advt lps govt a selventhiten sgp

by · Published · Updated

W. P.No.23369 of 2021and
W.M.P.Nos.24650, 24651 & 24653 of 2021
R.SURESH KUMAR, J.
Pursuant to the direction issued by this Court dated 08.11.2021, when the case is taken up for hearing, Mr.A.Selvendran, learned Government Counsel appearing for the respondents has submitted that, a policy decision had already been taken, pursuant to which, the Government decided to cancel the Government Order i.e., G.O(Ms).No.146 dated 24.12.2020 of the Co-operative Department, in which, the project i.e. Training Institute at Yercaud was sanctioned with administrative as well as financial sanction. In support of the said contention, the learned Government Counsel has produced a copy of the present Government Order i.e. G.O(Ms).No.99 Co-operative, Food and Consumer Protection Department, dated 09.11.2021, where, inter alia the following has been stated :
“4/ nkw;fhQqk; mwptpg;g[ bjhlu;ghf nkny K:d;whtjhfg; gof;fg;gl;l fojj;jpy;. Tl;Lwt[ r’;f’;fspd; gjpthsu;. jkpHf Tl;Lwt[ ,af;fk; 100 Mz;Lfs; fle;j epiyapy; Tl;Lwt[
,af;fj;jpid tYg;gLj;Jk; nehf;fj;Jld;
Tl;Lwt[ Muha;r;rp cl;gl nkk;gLj;jg;gl;l nritfs; tH’;f VJthf njrpa mstpyhd gapw;rp epiyak; mikg;gjd; K:yk; Tl;Lwt[g; gzpahsu;fs; cWg;gpdu;fs; kw;Wk; bghJkf;fs; midtUk; gad;bgWtu; vdt[k; bfhilf;fhdy; Kf;fpaj;Jtk; tha;e;j kiyg; gpunjrkhf cs;sjhYk; jkpHfj;jpd; kj;jpag; gFjpapy; cs;sjhYk; midj;J kf;fSk; Rygkhf mQqf ,aYk; vd;gjhYk; m’;F 20 Vf;fh; epyk; cs;sjhYk; Tl;Lwt[ gapw;rp kw;Wk; Muha;r;rp epiyak; kpfr; rpwg;ghft[k;. bjhiynehf;F ghu;ita[lDk; TLjy; trjpa[ld; mHfpa ,aw;ifr; R{Hypy; mikj;jplyhk; vdt[k; bjuptpj;Js;shu;/ nkYk;. jkpH;ehl;oy; Vw;bfdnt khepy mstpyhd Tl;Lwt[ gapw;rp epiya’;fshf brd;idapy; enlrd; Tl;Lwt[ nkyhz;ik epiyak; kw;Wk; kJiuapy; Tl;Lwt[ nkyhz;ik epiyak; bray;gl;L tUfpwJ/ nkYk; nryk; khtl;lj;jpy; Vwf;hlo;w;F mUfpy; Vw;bfdnt khtl;l mstpy; ehrr;pag;gh Tl;Lwt[ nkyhz;ik gapw;rp epiyak; bray;gl;L tUfpwJ/ ,e;epiyapy;. bfhilf;fhdypy; njrpa mstpyhd Tl;Lwt[ gapw;rp epiyak; mikf;fg;glt[s;sjhy;. Vwf;hlo;y; g[jpa khepy mstpyhd gapw;rp epiyak; mikf;Fk; nehf;fk; epiwntw tha;g;g[fs; Fiwt[ vdt[k; bjuptpj;Js;shu;/ vdnt. Vwf;hlo;y; mikat[s;s khepy mstpyhd gapw;rp epiyak; mikgg;ij iftplyhk; vdt[k;. mjw;fhf xJf;fgl;l 4/33 Vf;fu; epyj;jpid Vw;fhl;oy; cs;s kiythH; kf;fs; bgUk;gynehf;F Tl;Lwt[r; r’;fj;jpw;F
(LAMP) tH’;Ftjd; K:yk; kiythH; kf;fspd; nkk;ghl;ow;fhf gjdpLk; myFfs; mikg;gjw;Fk;. kiythH; kf;fspd; tpiy bghUl;fis kjpg;g[ Tl;lg;gl;l (Value Added) bghUl;fshf khww;p tpw;gid bra;jpl eltof;iffs; vLf;f ,aYk; ,jdhy; kiythH; kf;fspd; thH;thjhuk; cau tHptFf;Fk; vdt[k; Tl;Lwt[r; r’f;’;fspd; gjpthsu; bjuptpj;Js;shu;/
5/ nkw;fz;l fhuz’;fshy; njrpa mstpy; bfhilf;fhdypy; Tl;Lwt[ nkyhz;ik gog;g[ kw;Wk; gapw;rp epiyak; mikf;fg;glt[s;s epiyapy;. khepy mstpyhd gapw;rp epiyak; nryk; khtl;lk;. Vw;fhL jhYf;fh. k”;rf;Fl;il Cuhlr;p. brk;kLt[ fpuhkj;jpy; mikf;f tH’;fg;gl;l mDkjpapid uj;J bra;J Miz tH’;fpLkhW Tl;Lwt[r; r’;f’f;spd; gjpthsu; muirf; nfl;Lf; bfhz;Ls;shu;/
6/ nkny gj;jp 5y; cs;s Tl;Lwt[r; r’;f’;fspd; gjpthsupd; fUj;JUtpid muR ftdkhf guprPypj;J njrpa mstpy; bfhilf;fhdypy; Tl;Lwt[ nkyhz;ik gog;g[ kw;Wk; gapw;rp epiyak; mikf;fg;glt[s;s epiyapy;. Vw;bfdnt khepy mstpyhd gapw;rp epiyak; nryk; khtl;lk;. Vw;fhL jhYf;fh. k”;rf;Fl;il Cuhl;rp. brk;kLt[ fpuhkj;jpy; mikf;f mDkjp tH’;fp btspaplg;gl;l nkny ,uz;ltjhfg; gof;fg;gl;l murhizapid ,uj;J bra;ayhk; vd Kot[ bra;J muR mt;thnw MizapLfpwJ/
(MSeupd; Mizg;go)
KfkJ erpKj;jpd;
muR TLjy; jiyikr; brayhsu;
2. Since the Government has taken a decision to cancel the project at Yercaud by cancelling the earlier G.O. dated 24.12.2020 as stated supra and issued the new G.O. in G.O(Ms).No.99 dated 09.11.2021, this Court feels that, now the focus is shifted on the G.O.(Ms)No.99.
3. Nevertheless, Mr.P.H.Aravind Pandian, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that, insofar as the on going project or the project already undertaken by spending huge money is concerned, what is the stage of the construction, how much of money has been spent on it has to be ascertained. For the said purpose, though a direction was given by this Court by earlier order dated 08.11.2021 directing the respondents to file a report to that effect, the said report since has not been filed, that aspect cannot be unearthed. Therefore, the learned Senior Counsel requested the Court to get such report from the respondents for the Court’s perusal and further decision.
4. In this regard, the learned Government Counsel appearing for the respondents, on instruction, would submit that, the report, as sought for by earlier order of this Court dated 08.11.2021, is almost made ready and it would be filed next week, hence, he seeks accommodation till 24th of this month.
5. Hence, for the said purpose, i.e., for filing the report as sought for by order dated 08.11.2021, post the matter on 24.11.2021. The learned Government Counsel also submits that, the copy of the G.O.(Ms).No.99 dated 09.11.2021 has been served on the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. The same is hereby recorded.
16.11.2021
Note: Issue order copy on 16.11.2021
Sgl/Sp
R.SURESH KUMAR, J.
Sgl
W. P.No.23369 of 2021 and
W.M.P.Nos.24650, 24651
& 24653 of 2021
16.11.2021

You may also like...