Today law tips vinothpandian

[15/03, 10:22] Vinothpandian: 1976 (1) SCC 172 : kartarey vs state of UP : To be an absconder in the eye of law, it is not necessary that a person should have run away from his home , it is sufficient if he hides himself to evade the process of law even if the hiding place be his own home
[15/03, 10:22] Vinothpandian: Supreme court SLP no 1876 of 2018 dated 10- 02- 2021 M/ S kalamani tex vs P Balasubramanian : If blank cheque voluntarily signed and handed over by accused towards payment , presumption under section 139 NI act is attracted
[15/03, 10:22] Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) supreme 662 : Rohit bhai jivanlal Patel vs state of gujarat : general principles of appeal against acquittal not applicable in case of offence under sec 138 of NI act
[15/03, 10:22] Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) supreme 129 : Bir singh vs mukesh Kumar: No statutory notice issued after first default and no proceedings initiated , proceedings after successive default not impermissible ( sec 138 NI act 1882 )

You may also like...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
CALL ME