You may also like...
-
JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE W.P.No.26731 of 2023 Dr.Pratheeksha This Court therefore, can only suggest to the respondents that, subject to the approval of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, a window may be opened for all those candidates, who might have missed an opportunity due to certain inadvertent faults such as the one occasioned to the petitioner, grant them an opportunity to correct them after the conclusion of the stray-counselling, and to prepare a rank list for these candidates, and to try accommodating whoever who is willing to join the unfilled up seats. Instead of letting some medical seats lapse, an attempt may be made to fill them up. To conclude, playing within the bounds of law and summoning its sense of equity and justice, this Court merely make a suggestion to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner after all the rounds of counselling, if some seats still remain vacant, but only after obtaining necessary approval for the same from the Hon’ble Supreme Court. Wishing the petitioner good luck, this Court informs her that it may not be possible for it to go any further than what it has done above, for, unlike Louis XIV, this Court cannot proclaim that it is a law unto itself, but as a creation of the Constitution, is also bound by rule of law. This petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. 11.09.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order ds Note : Issue order copy today (11.09.2023) To: 1.The National Board of Examination Medical Enclave, Ansari Nagar P.O.Box No.4931, Ring Road New Delhi – 110 029. 2.The Medical Counselling Committee Allotment Process – Counselling Directorate General of Health Services Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India Nirman Bhawan, Maulana Azad Road New Delhi – 110 011. 3.The National Medical Commission Pocket-II, Sector-8, Dwaraka Phase-I New Delhi – 110 077. N.SESHASAYEE.J., ds Pre-delivery order in W.P.No.26731 of 2023 11.09.2023
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 11, 2023
-
Accordingly, the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent in Roc.J2/91317/2001 dated 16.10.2002 partly confirm wing the order passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai in proceedings dated 15.06.2001 is quashed and consequently, the subject lands are resumed in favour of the petitioner / temple. The 1st respondent is directed to resume the temple land in favour of the temple, by evicting the occupants within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands allowed. No costs. 21.04.2023 Jeni Index : Yes Speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes To 1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai. S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. Jeni W.P.No.7775 of 2003 21.04.2023
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 2, 2023
-
Mhc Advt Elango: மூத்த வழக்கறிஞர் எஸ். துரைசாமி – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
by Sekar Reporter · Published October 19, 2020