Supreme Court quashes MHA order to pay full salaries during coronavirus lockdown by Sekar Reporter · May 20, 2020 WRAPECONOMY AND POLITICSSTORYSupreme Court quashes MHA order to pay full salaries during coronavirus lockdownBusinessToday.In | Monday, May 18, 2020 | 23:12 ISTThe judgement came against a writ petition filed by Karnataka-based company Ficus Pax Private Limited, which had challenged the constitutional validity of government notifications mandating full wage payments during lockdownShareSupreme Court has overturned an order by the Ministry Home Affairs which asked industries to pay full wages to their employees for the lockdown period. The apex court has ordered government not to take any coercive action against private companies unable to pay the full salaries to their workers.The judgement came against a writ petition filed by Karnataka-based company Ficus Pax Private Limited, which had challenged the constitutional validity of a March 20 notification by the Labour Secretary and clause III of the March 29 notification by the Home Ministry, both of which compelled payment of full wages to workers and employees during the period of lockdown.ALSO READ:Moderna shares spike 39% after COVID-19 vaccine shows positive results in early trialThe company had argued that government orders mandating full salary payment to workers violated Articles 14 and 19 (1)(g) of the Constitution of India, which refer to equality before law and right to practise any profession, occupation or trade, respectively. It had further said that the order was in contravention of the principles of ‘Equal Work, Equal Pay’ and ‘No Work, No Pay’, as it doesn’t differentiate between the workers who are working during lockdown“How long can the government expect companies to pay?” a three-judge bench headed by Justice L Nageswara Rao asked Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who sought further time to respond to the petition.ALSO READ:Delhi coronavirus: Number
[8/6, 13:35] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/fWziVvx69fM [8/6, 13:35] sekarreporter1: எது hurt எது injury civil judges question answer by adv chamdrasekar August 6, 2023 by Sekar Reporter · Published August 6, 2023
https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1725849086912585941?t=zETzh7JWdHwAvz-9BxF0IQ&s=08 Legal heir case THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR A.S.No .596 of 2019 and C.M.P.No.18161 of 2019 1.Agnes @ Karpaga Devi 2.Minor Amala Jenifer. We place on record our sincere gratitude and appreciation to Ms.B.S.Mitra Neshaa for the valuable assistance rendered to enable us to clear the air in respect succession in case of Christian who leaves behind a widow, kindred and mother. (R.S.M.,J.) (N.S.,J.) 07.11.2023 November 18, 2023 by Sekar Reporter · Published November 18, 2023
Appiontment of archagas stayed –W.P.No.16287 of 2021 and WMP Nos.17238 and 17241 of 2021 DR. ANITA SUMANTH, J. Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan, learned Government Advocate accepts notice for R1 and R2 and seeks some time to obtain instructions and file a counter. August 9, 2021 by Sekar Reporter · Published August 9, 2021