SEKAR REPORTER Blog

law of wills : Thiagarajan s vs chitkala govindasamy : will entirely handwritten dated and signed by testator but not signed by required witness ,type written will containing signature of attesting witness cannot be construed as holographic will ,mere non – mentioning of earlier will is not fatal

law of wills : Thiagarajan s vs chitkala govindasamy : will entirely handwritten dated and signed by testator but not signed by required witness ,type written will containing signature of attesting witness cannot be construed as holographic will ,mere non – mentioning of earlier will is not fatal

[29/09, 09:52] Vinothpandian: 2016(3) CTC 501 : law of wills : Thiagarajan s vs chitkala govindasamy : will entirely handwritten dated and signed by testator but not signed by required witness ,type written will...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

வழக்கறிஞர் அறிவழகன் சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்ற நீதிபதி தண்டபாணி,முறையீடு செய்தார்.

கரூரில் நடந்த விஜய் பிரச்சாரத்தின் போது கூட்ட நெரிசலில் சிக்கி 39 பேர் பலியான விவகாரம், தொடர்பாக இன்றெ மதியம் 2.15 மணி அளவில் விசாரிக்கப்படும் என சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் அறிவித்துள்ளது. த.வெ.க. தலைவரும், நடிகருமான விஜய், வாரம்தோறும் சனிக்கிழமையன்று பிரசார கூட்டங்களை நடத்தி வருகிறார்....

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Let this exercise be undertaken at the earliest and be completed within a period of three months from today without fail. 22. In view of the aforesaid, the connected application of Wing Commander Kartika Kilam (Retd.) is also allowed in the aforesaid terms. 23. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. …………………………………………J (J.B. PARDIWALA) …………………………………………J (K.V. VISWANATHAN)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NOS.1718-1721/2025(@Diary No.32025/2024) IN CIVIL APPEAL NOS.79-82/2012 WG CDR ANUPAMA JOSHI RETD Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NOS.1722-1725/2025(@Diary...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

The High Court is requested to rehear the appeals filed by the respondents/accused respectively in these appeals by also giving an opportunity to the appellant-State herein to make its submission in the said appeals as well as the accused to make this submission in the matter.

2025 INSC 1170 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.736-738/2015 THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Appellant(s) VERSUS ANIL & ORS. Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

I do not find any grounds being available to the revision petitioner to seek interference under Article 227 of Constitution of India. 29.In fine, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 29.08.2025 Speaking/Non-speaking order Index : Yes/No ata To The XVII Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai. P.B.BALAJI. J, ata

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Order reserved on : 04.08.2025 Order pronounced on : 29.08.2025 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI CRP.No.2124 of 2024 & CMP.No.11284 of 2024 Metrozone Apartment Owners Association,...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version