SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Good Morning. Welcome to the world of Mahakavi Subramania Bharathoyar book release function sunday pnpj Vpj. Grsj. .To coincicde with his 101st death anniversary on Sept,11,2022, Kalaimagal Publications,Chennai is bringing out  the book. Kalaimagal is seeking pre publication orders.

Uncategorized

Good Morning. Welcome to the world of Mahakavi Subramania Bharathoyar book release function sunday pnpj Vpj. Grsj. .To coincicde with his 101st death anniversary on Sept,11,2022, Kalaimagal Publications,Chennai is bringing out  the book. Kalaimagal is seeking pre publication orders.

Bharathi 101   Good Morning. Welcome to the world of Mahakavi Subramania Bharathoyar.To coincicde with his 101st death anniversary on Sept,11,2022, Kalaimagal Publications,Chennai is bringing out  the book. Kalaimagal is seeking pre publication orders....

[9/9, 13:02] Sekarreporter1: The validity of Sec. 10(1)(I) of the NMC Act, 2019 has been upheld. Court has held that all medical colleges, including those run by deemed universities, will come under NMC fee fixation only. With respect to the Office Memorandum, the Court has held that directing fees for 50% of seats to be fixed equivalent to govt college fees will result in cross subsidy which is barred by the Supreme Court. The court has further held that the same will also result in seats going vacant due to high fees. Therefore, the Court has directed the NMC to reconsider and issue a fresh Office Memorandum in light of the judgment. Till then, the court has directed that existing fee fixation practise will continue. [9/9, 13:02] Sekarreporter1: Mr. Vijaynarayan, PS Raman and ArL Sundaresan appeared for petitioners. [9/9, 13:02] Sekarreporter1: Learned ASG appeared for respondents.

Uncategorized

[9/9, 13:02] Sekarreporter1: The validity of Sec. 10(1)(I) of the NMC Act, 2019 has been upheld. Court has held that all medical colleges, including those run by deemed universities, will come under NMC fee fixation only. With respect to the Office Memorandum, the Court has held that directing fees for 50% of seats to be fixed equivalent to govt college fees will result in cross subsidy which is barred by the Supreme Court. The court has further held that the same will also result in seats going vacant due to high fees. Therefore, the Court has directed the NMC to reconsider and issue a fresh Office Memorandum in light of the judgment. Till then, the court has directed that existing fee fixation practise will continue. [9/9, 13:02] Sekarreporter1: Mr. Vijaynarayan, PS Raman and ArL Sundaresan appeared for petitioners. [9/9, 13:02] Sekarreporter1: Learned ASG appeared for respondents.

    [9/9, 13:02] Sekarreporter1: The validity of Sec. 10(1)(I) of the NMC Act, 2019 has been upheld. Court has held that all medical colleges, including those run by deemed universities, will come under...

Judge r subramaniyam order view of the above, while condemning the second respondent for its outrageous and inexplicable conduct, I direct the second respondent to pay a compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- to the petitioner.  The said compensation shall be paid within a period of four weeks from today, failing which the compensation amount will carry interest at 9% per annum from the date of the order of Hon’ble Mrs.Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana, i.e., 30.06.2017 till date of payment. 21. The Writ Petition will stand allowed as directed above. Apart from the damages the second respondent will also pay a cost of Rs.1,00,000/- to the petitioner. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 07.09.2022 jv https://www.sekarreporter.com/judge-r-subramaniyam-order-view-of-the-above-while-condemning-the-second-respondent-for-its-outrageous-and-inexplicable-conduct-i-direct-the-second-respondent-to-pay-a-compensation-of-rs-1000000/

Uncategorized

Judge r subramaniyam order view of the above, while condemning the second respondent for its outrageous and inexplicable conduct, I direct the second respondent to pay a compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- to the petitioner.  The said compensation shall be paid within a period of four weeks from today, failing which the compensation amount will carry interest at 9% per annum from the date of the order of Hon’ble Mrs.Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana, i.e., 30.06.2017 till date of payment. 21. The Writ Petition will stand allowed as directed above. Apart from the damages the second respondent will also pay a cost of Rs.1,00,000/- to the petitioner. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 07.09.2022 jv https://www.sekarreporter.com/judge-r-subramaniyam-order-view-of-the-above-while-condemning-the-second-respondent-for-its-outrageous-and-inexplicable-conduct-i-direct-the-second-respondent-to-pay-a-compensation-of-rs-1000000/

Judge r subramaniyam order view of the above, while condemning the second respondent for its outrageous and inexplicable conduct, I direct the second respondent to pay a compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- to the petitioner.  The...

Judge r subramaniyam order view of the above, while condemning the second respondent for its outrageous and inexplicable conduct, I direct the second respondent to pay a compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- to the petitioner.  The said compensation shall be paid within a period of four weeks from today, failing which the compensation amount will carry interest at 9% per annum from the date of the order of Hon’ble Mrs.Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana, i.e., 30.06.2017 till date of payment. 21. The Writ Petition will stand allowed as directed above. Apart from the damages the second respondent will also pay a cost of Rs.1,00,000/- to the petitioner. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 07.09.2022 jv

Uncategorized

Judge r subramaniyam order view of the above, while condemning the second respondent for its outrageous and inexplicable conduct, I direct the second respondent to pay a compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- to the petitioner.  The said compensation shall be paid within a period of four weeks from today, failing which the compensation amount will carry interest at 9% per annum from the date of the order of Hon’ble Mrs.Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana, i.e., 30.06.2017 till date of payment. 21. The Writ Petition will stand allowed as directed above. Apart from the damages the second respondent will also pay a cost of Rs.1,00,000/- to the petitioner. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 07.09.2022 jv

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on 02.09.2022 Delivered on      07.09.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE  MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN W.P.No.16762 of 2017 and WMP Nos.18202 to 18204 of 2017 Minor V.Amrutha Rep. through...

Medical college and deemed university fees case mhc cheif justice bench full order. Petitioner in : Mr.Vijay Narayan W.P.No.10088 of 2022 Senior Counsel for Mr.Abishek Jenasenan For the Respondents in : Mr.R.Sankaranarayanan W.P.No.10088 of 2022 Addl. Solicitor-General assisted by Mr.Rajesh Vivekananthan Asst. Solicitor-General for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and Ms.Shubaranjani Anand for respondent No.3 and Ms.V.Sudha for respondent No.4 and batch cases: COMMON ORDER THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Uncategorized

Medical college and deemed university fees case mhc cheif justice bench full order. Petitioner in : Mr.Vijay Narayan W.P.No.10088 of 2022 Senior Counsel for Mr.Abishek Jenasenan For the Respondents in : Mr.R.Sankaranarayanan W.P.No.10088 of 2022 Addl. Solicitor-General assisted by Mr.Rajesh Vivekananthan Asst. Solicitor-General for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and Ms.Shubaranjani Anand for respondent No.3 and Ms.V.Sudha for respondent No.4 and batch cases: COMMON ORDER THE CHIEF JUSTICE

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON :  17.08.2022 DELIVERED ON : 09.09.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA Nos.10088, 11595, 11598, 11601,...

VAIDYANATHAN, J. AND A.D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.                         When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor that the 4th Respondent in this case, namely, Babu @ Babu Sanjeevi has been detained under Section 2(f) of the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 by branding him as a Goonda. It is further represented that a case in Crime No.54 of 2022 on the file of the Thakkolam Police Station has been registered against C.Sri Muruga, Advocate

Uncategorized

VAIDYANATHAN, J. AND A.D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.                         When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor that the 4th Respondent in this case, namely, Babu @ Babu Sanjeevi has been detained under Section 2(f) of the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 by branding him as a Goonda. It is further represented that a case in Crime No.54 of 2022 on the file of the Thakkolam Police Station has been registered against C.Sri Muruga, Advocate

H.C.P.No.728 of 2022   D.SHANTHI LATE W/O.DURAIRAJ, NO.19-A 11TH CROSS STREET, POOMBUGAR NAGAR, KOLATHUR, CHENNAI – 600 099. THE STATE REP BY ITS, THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, V-6 KOLATHUR POLICE STATION, KOLATHUR CHENNAI –...

Justices S Vaidyanathan & AD Jagadish Chandira of Madras HC record the claim of advocate Rupert Barnabas that at least 7 lawyers, holding significant posts in Bar Council of Tamil Nadu & Puducherry, have a criminal background. Decide to hear him elaborately on Sep 28. List this matter on 28.09.2022. Registry is directed to print the names of Mr.T.Mohan and Mr.Rubert Barnaboss, Advocates in the cause list.   (S.V.N. J.,)       (A.D.J.C. J.,) 06.09.2022               .

Uncategorized

Justices S Vaidyanathan & AD Jagadish Chandira of Madras HC record the claim of advocate Rupert Barnabas that at least 7 lawyers, holding significant posts in Bar Council of Tamil Nadu & Puducherry, have a criminal background. Decide to hear him elaborately on Sep 28. List this matter on 28.09.2022. Registry is directed to print the names of Mr.T.Mohan and Mr.Rubert Barnaboss, Advocates in the cause list.   (S.V.N. J.,)       (A.D.J.C. J.,) 06.09.2022               .

Justices S Vaidyanathan & AD Jagadish Chandira of Madras HC record the claim of advocate Rupert Barnabas that at least 7 lawyers, holding significant posts in Bar Council of Tamil Nadu & Puducherry, have...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com