SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Justice Abdul Quddhose opined that the petitioner should have taken up the matter with the Administrative Tribunal dealing with service matters and not approach the High Court in the first instance. No Government servant will be entitled to approach the High Court as a Court of first instance challenging an order passed by the Government regarding a service matter. For Petitioner        : Mr.M.Ravi                                  For Respondents 1 to 3 & 5                  : Mr.Sankaranarayanan,   Additional Solictor General   Assisted by   Ms.R.Hemalatha, CGSC For Respondent 4       : Ms.R.Vaigai, Senior Advocate,   for M/s.Anna Mathew

Uncategorized

Justice Abdul Quddhose opined that the petitioner should have taken up the matter with the Administrative Tribunal dealing with service matters and not approach the High Court in the first instance. No Government servant will be entitled to approach the High Court as a Court of first instance challenging an order passed by the Government regarding a service matter. For Petitioner        : Mr.M.Ravi                                  For Respondents 1 to 3 & 5                  : Mr.Sankaranarayanan,   Additional Solictor General   Assisted by   Ms.R.Hemalatha, CGSC For Respondent 4       : Ms.R.Vaigai, Senior Advocate,   for M/s.Anna Mathew

I Justice Abdul Quddhose opined that the petitioner should have taken up the matter with the Administrative Tribunal dealing with service matters and not approach the High Court in the first instance. No Government servant...

GLIMPSE OF A LATEST VERDICT* *Minor V.Amrutha Vs. Council for Archietecture & Anr.* W.P.No.16762 of 2017 Dated: 07.09.2022 *Honourable Mr. Justice R. Subramanian * allowed the Writ Petition and awarded compensation and costs in the matter relating to *“NATA – Education – ”* and further observed and held as follows:

Uncategorized

GLIMPSE OF A LATEST VERDICT* *Minor V.Amrutha Vs. Council for Archietecture & Anr.* W.P.No.16762 of 2017 Dated: 07.09.2022 *Honourable Mr. Justice R. Subramanian * allowed the Writ Petition and awarded compensation and costs in the matter relating to *“NATA – Education – ”* and further observed and held as follows:

[9/10, 07:27] Sekarreporter1: https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/2022/09/10/judge-r-subramaniyam-order-view-of-the-above-while-condemning-the-second-respondent-for-its-outrageous-and-inexplicable-conduct-i-direct-the-second-respondent-to-pay-a-compensation-of-rs-1000000/ [9/11, 07:18] Sekarreporter1: *GLIMPSE OF A LATEST VERDICT* *Minor V.Amrutha Vs. Council for Archietecture & Anr.* W.P.No.16762 of 2017 Dated: 07.09.2022 *Honourable Mr. Justice R. Subramanian * allowed the Writ...

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.OP.Nos.6111 & 6130 of 2021 and Crl.MP.Nos.4022, 4023 4037 & 4038 of 2021 Crl.OP.No.6111 of 2021. Passport casePetitioner       : Mr.B.Kumar,  Senior Counsel  for M/s.Usharaman For Respondents For R1        : Mr.A.Gopinath,  Government Advocate(crl.side) Accordingly, the entire proceedings in CC.Nos.2031 & 2032 of 2021 on the file of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai, thereby taken cognizance for the offences under Section 12(1-A)(a) of Passports Act, in Crime Nos.274 & 303 of 2019 is quashed as against the petitioners and both the criminal original petitions are allowed.

Uncategorized

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.OP.Nos.6111 & 6130 of 2021 and Crl.MP.Nos.4022, 4023 4037 & 4038 of 2021 Crl.OP.No.6111 of 2021. Passport casePetitioner       : Mr.B.Kumar,  Senior Counsel  for M/s.Usharaman For Respondents For R1        : Mr.A.Gopinath,  Government Advocate(crl.side) Accordingly, the entire proceedings in CC.Nos.2031 & 2032 of 2021 on the file of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai, thereby taken cognizance for the offences under Section 12(1-A)(a) of Passports Act, in Crime Nos.274 & 303 of 2019 is quashed as against the petitioners and both the criminal original petitions are allowed.

  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on : 26.08.2022 Pronounced on : 08.09.2022 CORAM   THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.OP.Nos.6111 & 6130 of 2021 and Crl.MP.Nos.4022, 4023 4037 &...

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Sub. Appl.No.98 of 2019 in Cont.P.No.830 of 2014 in W.P.No.34530 of 2012 The State Transport and Transport Corporations, Retired Employees Welfare Association. For Petitioner        :  Mr.A.R.L.Sundaresan  Senior Counsel  for Mr.G.Sankaran For Respondents   :  Mr.R.Ramanlal  Additional Advocate General  assisted by Mr.C.Selvaraj  Government Advocate ORDER directed to pay the enhanced Dearness Allowance to the State Government Transport Retired Employees ,

Uncategorized

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Sub. Appl.No.98 of 2019 in Cont.P.No.830 of 2014 in W.P.No.34530 of 2012 The State Transport and Transport Corporations, Retired Employees Welfare Association. For Petitioner        :  Mr.A.R.L.Sundaresan  Senior Counsel  for Mr.G.Sankaran For Respondents   :  Mr.R.Ramanlal  Additional Advocate General  assisted by Mr.C.Selvaraj  Government Advocate ORDER directed to pay the enhanced Dearness Allowance to the State Government Transport Retired Employees ,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :02.09.2022 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Sub. Appl.No.98 of 2019 in Cont.P.No.830 of 2014 in W.P.No.34530 of 2012 The State Transport and Transport...

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.21544 of 2022 d)The guidelines stipulated for preliminary enquiry or registration of FIR by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others [2014 (2) SCC (1)] shall be strictly adhere. For Petitioners          :  Mr.T.Shanmugarajeswaran                                  For Respondent        :  Mr.S.Santhosh    Government Advocate (Crl.side)  ORDER

Uncategorized

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.21544 of 2022 d)The guidelines stipulated for preliminary enquiry or registration of FIR by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others [2014 (2) SCC (1)] shall be strictly adhere. For Petitioners          :  Mr.T.Shanmugarajeswaran                                  For Respondent        :  Mr.S.Santhosh    Government Advocate (Crl.side)  ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:  08.09.2022 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.21544 of 2022 1.S.Prakash 2.Meenakshi Ammal 3.P.Karpagavalli 4.Kumaresan                                    …Petitioners Vs. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch,...

Caae against k n neru quashed. THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.17223 of 2022 K.N.Nehru        …  Petitioner           Vs The Government of Tamilnadu rep by.       For Petitioner            : Mr.A.S.Aswin Prasanna                                  For Respondent        : Mr.E.Raj Thilak,             Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER This petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in ,

Uncategorized

Caae against k n neru quashed. THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.17223 of 2022 K.N.Nehru        …  Petitioner           Vs The Government of Tamilnadu rep by.       For Petitioner            : Mr.A.S.Aswin Prasanna                                  For Respondent        : Mr.E.Raj Thilak,             Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER This petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in ,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 06.09.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.17223 of 2022 K.N.Nehru        …  Petitioner           Vs The Government of Tamilnadu rep by, The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore...

Madras high court sep 10 th orders news click the link and read

Uncategorized

Madras high court sep 10 th orders news click the link and read

[9/9, 11:19] Sekarreporter1: தனியார் மருத்துவ கல்லூரிகள் 50 சதவீத மாணவர்களிடம் அரசு மருத்துவக் கல்லூரி கட்டணத்தையே வசூலிக்க வேண்டும் என்ற உத்தரவை மறு ஆய்வு செய்ய வேண்டும்… தேசிய மருத்துவ ஆணையத்துக்கு சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவு… கட்டணம் உத்தரவை மறு ஆய்வு செய்யும் நடைமுறை...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com