SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Hi sir this is Shivesh Advocate MHC # Case Headnotes Judge Krishna Kumar order  Writ petition under Art. 226 of Constitution of India – Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus – Petitioners acquitted in a false criminal case – separate charge memo filed – After delay of 9 years.  Held: Department cannot file second charge memo for the same facts and circumstances of first charge memo – Inordinate and unexplained delay of 9 years in filing charge memo – Writ petitions allowed – Court also directed the Government to issue revised guidelines for timely filing of charge memo as and if needed – revised guidelines published

Hi sir this is Shivesh Advocate MHC # Case Headnotes Judge Krishna Kumar order Writ petition under Art. 226 of Constitution of India – Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus – Petitioners acquitted in a false criminal case – separate charge memo filed – After delay of 9 years. Held: Department cannot file second charge memo for the same facts and circumstances of first charge memo – Inordinate and unexplained delay of 9 years in filing charge memo – Writ petitions allowed – Court also directed the Government to issue revised guidelines for timely filing of charge memo as and if needed – revised guidelines published

I [9/14, 14:41] Sekarreporter1: [9/14, 14:24] Hi sir this is Shivesh Advocate MHC # Case Headnotes Judge Krishna Kumar order Writ petition under Art. 226 of Constitution of India – Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus...

Admk lock and seal case key case sc full order in ops appeal.    However, since other legal proceedings are pending between the parties, it is clarified that the observation that the observations contained in the impugned  order shall not affect the merit of those proceedings.  Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.                  (SANJAY KUMAR-I)                (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR)    battle of advts.   HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD           HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI  For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv.  Mr. Guru Krishna Kumar, Sr. Adv.  Mr. P. Raja Lakshmi, Adv.  Mr. Goutham Shivshankar, AOR Mr. Adit Jayeshbhai Shah, Adv.                      For Respondent(s) Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv.  Mr. K.V. Vishwanathan, Sr. Adv.  Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv.  Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, AOR Mr. K. Gowtham Kumar, Adv.  Mr. Shiva Krishnamurti, Adv.  Ms. Aakriti Priya, Adv.  Mrs. Lakshmi R. Rao, Adv.  Ms. Gauri Pasricha, Adv.  Mr. Prabhu V., Adv.  Mr. V. Krishnamurthy, Sr. Adv./AAG, Dr. Joseph Aristotle S., AoR.  Ms. Nupur Sharma, Adv.  Mr. Shobhit Dwivedi, Adv.  Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mahara, Adv.  Ms. Richa Vishwakarma, Adv.  UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following                                O R D E R

Admk lock and seal case key case sc full order in ops appeal. However, since other legal proceedings are pending between the parties, it is clarified that the observation that the observations contained in the impugned order shall not affect the merit of those proceedings. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.                 (SANJAY KUMAR-I)                (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) battle of advts. HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD          HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Guru Krishna Kumar, Sr. Adv. Mr. P. Raja Lakshmi, Adv. Mr. Goutham Shivshankar, AOR Mr. Adit Jayeshbhai Shah, Adv.                    For Respondent(s) Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv. Mr. K.V. Vishwanathan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, AOR Mr. K. Gowtham Kumar, Adv. Mr. Shiva Krishnamurti, Adv. Ms. Aakriti Priya, Adv. Mrs. Lakshmi R. Rao, Adv. Ms. Gauri Pasricha, Adv. Mr. Prabhu V., Adv. Mr. V. Krishnamurthy, Sr. Adv./AAG, Dr. Joseph Aristotle S., AoR. Ms. Nupur Sharma, Adv. Mr. Shobhit Dwivedi, Adv. Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mahara, Adv. Ms. Richa Vishwakarma, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following                               O R D E R

ITEM NO.47               COURT NO.2               SECTION II-C                S U P R E M E  C O U R T  O F  I N D I A                        RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave...

Madras high court orders sep 13 th whatsapp news

Madras high court orders sep 13 th whatsapp news

[9/14, 06:31] Sekarreporter1: அதிமுக அலுவலகத்தில் வன்முறையில் ஈடுபட்ட எடப்பாடி பழனிச்சாமி ஆதரவு மாவட்ட செய்லாளர்கள் மீது நடவடிக்கை எடுக்கக் கோரி பன்னீர்செல்வம் ஆதரவாளர் ஜே.சி டி. பிராபகர் தாக்கல் செய்த மனுவுக்கு பதிலளிக்கும்படி, காவல் துறைக்கு சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது. இதுதொடர்பாக முன்னாள் முதல்வர்...

Loganthan Former Agp: While disposing of a writ petition filed by Kasturbha and Indira Nagar Residents Welfare forum seeking to remove encroachments from the Buckingham Canal lying between Chennai and Puducherry, the Madras High Court emphasised that it was the duty of every individual to protect and improve the national environment and the national assets.

Loganthan Former Agp: While disposing of a writ petition filed by Kasturbha and Indira Nagar Residents Welfare forum seeking to remove encroachments from the Buckingham Canal lying between Chennai and Puducherry, the Madras High Court emphasised that it was the duty of every individual to protect and improve the national environment and the national assets.

[9/13, 19:00] Loganthan Former Agp: While disposing of a writ petition filed by Kasturbha and Indira Nagar Residents Welfare forum seeking to remove encroachments from the Buckingham Canal lying between Chennai and Puducherry, the...

Mhc order upheld by sc tn go fixing 50%mark for ttc course

Mhc order upheld by sc tn go fixing 50%mark for ttc course

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6991 OF 2015 THE DIRECTOR OF TEACHER’S TRAINING RESEARCH EDUCATION  & ANR.            Appellant(s) VERSUS O.M.JESSYMOL                                   Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6992...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com